tower lobby pics
#1
Posted 02 May 2005 - 04:25 PM
fine art...
floors 20+ on the left, 6-19 on the right
bookshelves for the "waiting area"
dome makes for a huge echo
LOb
#2
Posted 02 May 2005 - 05:19 PM
#3
Posted 02 May 2005 - 08:01 PM
#4
Posted 02 May 2005 - 09:46 PM
#5
Posted 02 May 2005 - 11:14 PM
I don't like the overly-busy design on the floor, the black accents between the wood panels (should have made it cleaner, very subtle seams) or the brass door handles. Those elements sort of dumb-down an otherwise sophisticated, clean design. In general, though, I like the Tower.
Whenever designers or developers fear turning off those with more naive taste, they tack on some gaudy garbage that, IMO, compromise the integrity of the design. For example, Schaumburg's designs are just dripping with imagery that connote wealth and sophistication to those who are themselves unsophisticated (at least in their taste in architectural design). The taste is like that of your typical 20-year old NBA player.
#6
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:20 AM
For example, Schaumburg's designs are just dripping with imagery that connote wealth and sophistication to those who are themselves unsophisticated (at least in their taste in architectural design). The taste is like that of your typical 20-year old NBA player.
What elements in particular have you noticed of Sch umburg's works that showcase this? Bathtub spouts rigged to pour out of a golden lion's mouth?
#7
Posted 03 May 2005 - 09:49 AM
For example, Schaumburg's designs are just dripping with imagery that connote wealth and sophistication to those who are themselves unsophisticated (at least in their taste in architectural design). The taste is like that of your typical 20-year old NBA player.
What elements in particular have you noticed of Sch umburg's works that showcase this? Bathtub spouts rigged to pour out of a golden lion's mouth?
#8
Posted 03 May 2005 - 12:32 PM
#9
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:31 PM
#10
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:42 PM
For example, Schaumburg's designs are just dripping with imagery that connote wealth and sophistication to those who are themselves unsophisticated (at least in their taste in architectural design). The taste is like that of your typical 20-year old NBA player.
What elements in particular have you noticed of Sch B) umburg's works that showcase this? Bathtub spouts rigged to pour out of a golden lion's mouth?
(My mistake about the brass - it doesn't look as though the doors have brass on them after all.)
Examples of Schaumburg's buildings that demonstrate what I said above?
We can start with the projects' ridiculous names.
- Le Bijou (The Jewel). Appears from the rendering to be one of his better ones, however is dripping with affectation. It is overly packed with ornament that is intended to make it look more luxurious and more Eurpean I suppose. It is nothing more than an interpretation of French architecture - not that similar to the real deal. We'll see what facade material he uses. In France, it would be stone.
- The Versailles. come on - what about the cheapo yellow stucco building w/ single-hung windows even vaguely resembles French architecture, let alone Versailles?
- Summit Ruins. This is the most ridiculous. It is intended to look like an ancient ruin crumbling around a modernist black glass box. It would be more appropriate in Vegas than Fort Worth.
I can't easily articulate the difference between serious architects and pretenders on the forum. I would assume most of you know the difference. There are those who are more progressive and those who are revivalists (e.g. Schwarz), each of which has its critics. Schaumburg appears to be neither - rather using architecture merely as a part of a marketing theme used to sell buildings - cheap interpretations of other parts of the world in exceedingly naive packages - as if designed to target those who have never seen those other places or who lack the design sensibility to know the difference between the real thing and the interpretation of it.
#11
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:55 PM
Lobs, nice pic, love the stuffed dog too. Looks like a cute harmless Eewok on all fours. DOHH, Dee Deee Deeeh Deeeh! Does everyone get to pet it as they walk out to work. Sort of like that rock on Clemson's football field. J/K ol Chum! Nice place , now I see what you payed for.
When at the front desk , do I ask for Lobs, MR. Lobs? Esquire?
Nah, nice pic's though, I am turning green. Could have been the bad English Muffins.
www.iheartfw.com
#12 David Love
Posted 06 May 2005 - 09:46 AM
#13
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:26 PM
#14 David Love
Posted 06 May 2005 - 07:51 PM
I think I will have to actually go into the space to make my evaluation. Although Lobster's pictures are good, it is just really too hard to tell from them what style it would be. David, a mix of styles might put it into the Post Modern period.
Postmodernism, I’ve always found that term confusing, it seems to be the catch all bucket for any peg that didn’t fit into its design exactly. Like the stick “tenured” architects whack newbie’s with when they deviate too far from the accepted design norm.
The layout seems to flow rather nicely and is exactly what you would think a well-dressed Fort Worth residence should come across as. I thought there had to be some sort of ambiguity or contradiction in two or more styles in addition to just the basic departure from the norms of modernism to qualify as postmodern? ...not sure really.
As you first enter from the street it appears to be solid Neoclassic, with all Greco-Roman lines and almost entirely made of stone, but then you enter into the “not sure how many sided,” (elevator atrium?) which still has some of the Neoclassic lines but morphs Arts & Craft detail and materials, not sure if the entrance had wood inlays or not.
I’m obviously not an architect, just a wanabe, but I’d like to believe the cross pollination of two architectural styles had the ability to create a new genre or style as apposed to just lumping any two combinations into a catch all definition. (sigh) wishful thinking I guess…
#15
Posted 07 May 2005 - 01:40 AM
Actually, it looks (judging by pic's) to be a bit Neo-Classical Asian inspired. Is that goldleaf all about the echo room? TLC sure gave the Hearst Castle a lil run for their money.
www.iheartfw.com
#16 David Love
Posted 08 May 2005 - 12:42 PM
What is that VELVET?
Actually, it looks (judging by pic's) to be a bit Neo-Classical Asian inspired. Is that goldleaf all about the echo room? TLC sure gave the Hearst Castle a lil run for their money.
Think they're going for a parchment look; I’ve seen that color in Arts & Craft lanterns.
I don’t think they were going for a specific style or period, just pleasing visually, think they succeeded.
#17
Posted 08 May 2005 - 12:54 PM
I think it looks vaguely art deco, vaguely arts and crafts, and a little Asian maybe. It's hard to overtly do one style or another without being kitschy. I think they went for modern with hints of those other styles and achieved something very classy. Can't wait to see it up close.
#18
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:16 PM
www.iheartfw.com
#19 David Love
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:35 PM
Arts & Craft Mica Lamp Link
#20 David Love
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:38 PM
Kinda grows on you.
#21
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:42 PM
www.iheartfw.com
#22 David Love
Posted 08 May 2005 - 07:57 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users