Reading through that article, do the problems getting this going not give people pause that the problem is not only building it, but that there is not much outside confidence that it can be something viable and sustainable. Like Race St. things are not always "if you build it..."
I don't deny that there is a deep community need, but even need alone does not automatically make a successful project.
I don't know enough about all of the elements of the project; is there a mechanism of ongoing support for X years to help it to become an established place and find its long term means?
I'm also worked that there are too many "asks" from the project. If it is important that it be built, does it make sense to then introduce additional hurdles and make a double-ask to say who and what kind of people must be doing the construction? In that article that is a stated hurdle that could not be gotten over.
It seems like we need to take steps in the right direction, not try to load up one project with solving every problem.