Why Visitors Can't Get a Good Look at Bass Hall
#1 G. O. Todd
Posted 24 February 2006 - 07:03 AM
Somehow, I kept thinking that the undeveloped space immediately north of the Bass Hall site would certainly be used for underground parking and for the Sundance plaza that I had read was being planned for that part of downtown Fort Worth.
To me it seemed fitting that -- given the stature of the new performance hall and limited space in front of the facade -- the architect would suggest "open space" across Fourth Street as an appropriate "approach" to the performance hall.
My "open space" dream was stamped out when I realized the block across Fourth St. was the site of a full block of low-rise retail buildings.
Question is: Why -- when several other blocks were unimproved at the time -- was the retail construction allowd across from Bass Hall . . . in effect blocking an appropriate approach to the building and appropriate sight lines to the front facade? This decision has robbed photographers and visitors of a a good look at a fantastic structure.
#2
Posted 24 February 2006 - 08:39 AM
I've no official information on your question, but I'm going to guess it's about creating some density and accessability by foot. I really enjoy the fact that it is literally accross the street from 3 restaurants, 2 - 3 bars and a coffee shop. It's very accessible.
I agree that you don't get a great look at it from the front, but I think it is impressive in its profile as you come down 4th street. The South, East and West sides aren't very interesting.
#3
Posted 24 February 2006 - 08:55 AM
#4
Posted 24 February 2006 - 12:56 PM
It was supposed to give Sundance a bit of that big-city feeling, where you can be walking down the street and just happen upon a grand auditorium.
#5
Posted 24 February 2006 - 01:07 PM
#6
Posted 24 February 2006 - 03:03 PM
#8
Posted 26 February 2006 - 04:19 AM
Have not heard nor used that word in quite some time. Circa 2000 Presidential elections.
I love the ideas of BPH either facing Commerce or having a "sweepeing visual" from the North front at a typical city block distance. An open airy park would have been nice, monumental, and very Greco stylish. Big fan of the BPH design, just needs to fit in with a better surrounding, or at least a more open pedestrian friendly surrounding. Much better views of BPH than that of the ChicagoPSHall. Part of much taller building, made of bland rose granite(?) and is virtually FLAT as a board.
BPH should have been used as a bookend to Main Street, where the FWCC DOME currently is. Did the FWSO play at the FWCC site before some time ago?
www.iheartfw.com
#9
Posted 26 February 2006 - 07:57 AM
#10
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:48 AM
#11
Posted 26 February 2006 - 03:04 PM
www.iheartfw.com
#12 G. O. Todd
Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:51 PM
The Bass interests have has such a remarkable string of successes with their projects in downtown Fort Worth, I'm just amazed that they (or Swartz) didn't foresee that Bass Hall would generate a lot of visual stimulation and that visitors, photogrpahers, and patrons alike would like to be able to view/photograph the facade.
Given that the space across Fourth was available and undeveloped at the time of BPH construction, it just seems there were a couple of viable options (other than building new, wall-to-wall retail) for that space --
(1) Plan/build at least part of the Sundance Plaze there, perhaps with underground parking (Heck, why not with connecting weather-proofed tunnels to BPH basement?)
(2) Design something unique for the retail -- sort of a "see-through," open, V-shaped configuration -- that would allow pedestrians and photographers an unobstructed view of BPH, without sacrificing all the retail space. Again, connected underground parking would have been nice.
I doubt that the patrons of Angeluna would have minded the few extra feet between them and "The Last Great Hall of the Century." Moving Angeluna out from under the trumpets would likely given patrons an even better view of the BPH facade.
Schwartz apparently did not extend the philosophy of "crowding" his structures to other projects; i.e., Cook Children's (Note the long view protected by the street approach from Eighth Avenue) and The Ballpark (visible for a couple of miles).
#13
Posted 01 March 2006 - 06:51 PM
#14 ghughes
Posted 01 March 2006 - 11:15 PM
#15
Posted 02 March 2006 - 11:18 AM
The Bass Hall was designed when there was only a parking lot in front of it.
I really hope the designers didn't think it would remain a parking lot forever.
Having greenspace in front of the hall would have been great, but I doubt anyone seriously considered purchasing limited downtown dirt to remain... dirt.
Erik France
#16
Posted 02 March 2006 - 11:36 AM
www.iheartfw.com
#17
Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:43 AM
Right off the bat, I can't remember what surrounds the area of the First United Methodist Church, but I read that Bass Hall has a European style design, which would of been so great had it been built near that Europen styled church only some land been available. Across or next to it in some way with green space in between with a large fountain, some european style resturants, etc.
Would of given FW a bit of a "European Atmosphere"
Some pics of John T. Roberts site (Hope its ok with ya John) to see how they would go together...
#18 G. O. Todd
Posted 03 March 2006 - 07:47 AM
Just an architectual fantasy where a better Bass Hall location could of been...
Right off the bat, I can't remember what surrounds the area of the First United Methodist Church, but I read that Bass Hall has a European style design, which would of been so great had it been built near that Europen styled church only some land been available. Across or next to it in some way with green space in between with a large fountain, some european style resturants, etc.
Would of given FW a bit of a "European Atmosphere"
Some pics of John T. Roberts site (Hope its ok with ya John) to see how they would go together...
The Methodist Church at the top of Florence Street (as you have depicted) is a great Fort Worth example of memorable design complemented with a favorable site to allow pedestrians to enjoy to enjoy the design. To me, this kind of positioning helps to give a structure more "landmark status" Going on top-of-mind memory, here are a few other memorable Fort Worth structures enhanced by their sites --
(1) Pier One (viewed from westbound Belknap)
(2) Cook Children's Hospital (end of street)
(3) Intermodal Terminal (end of Ninth)
(4) T&P* (end of Throckmorton)
(4) Saint Pat's (end of 14th)
(5) Tarrant County Court House (end of Main)
(6) The entrance to the new public library (end of street)
(7) Saint Stephen's Church (hilltop end of street)
(8) Arlington Heights HS (hilltop and end of street)
(9) Polythechnic HS (hilltop and end of street)
(10) Burnet Plaza* (view looking west on 7th)
* less than full view
Perhaps the shot depicting the Methodist Church is the best example of what a little open space could do for BPH . . . even though the shot you're showing is actually across what I call "enhanced" parking, it allows the kind of visual opportunity that even a small Sundance Plaza could have afforded BPH.
Just dreaming, I wish some visionary could sell a truly creative solution for the block across from BPH -- something similar to the new Montgmary Ward "Passthrough" or the open retail-surrounded open space in front of the Paris Opera. At Sundance, the entire block is new construction, not historically significant structures.
#19
Posted 03 March 2006 - 10:33 AM
Speaking of BPH, I hear that MR. Michael York (Franco Zeffirelli's ol Tybalt, AP's Basil Exposition and Homer Simpson's long lost father) is in COWtown for a Shakespeare narrative with our world class symphony. I just might go check it out. Any Shakespeare fans on board?
And speaking of BPH, have their been any of those "USUAL" stories OVERshadowing our world class symphony these days? You know like those "in DEBT" stories, which ususally get thrown about the metroplex this time of year. Been out of town for awhile and just have not kept up or heard of any. I certainly HOPE that they are not in debt, as that would be a darn shame.
If so they should just go on tour and promote the fantastic arts we encourage for our city and county. With a little public funding and donorship, it would be quite possible. Playing at BPH has to cost a perty penny. Perhaps a telethon of sorts on PBS, ABC, CBS, or Nbc could be remedy.
I guess if they can afford for Mr. York to be in town with them, then their books should reflect some strength. Even though I heard that they recently lost both their GM and President of last year. Makes you wonder where exactly they are headin.
Figure with all of these corporate entities involved within our county, it's gotta be a charitable goldmine for the taking. Maybe they should hire a local Girl Scout leader to help alleviate any possible financial woes. Gratis work of course. Possibly create a new leadership patch that resembles a musical note with a money bag or RED CROSS on it. Sadly enough, there are plenty of those to give around these days.
www.iheartfw.com
#20
Posted 03 March 2006 - 10:56 AM
Not to mention the big Fort Worth connection to Mr. York - his lead role as Logan 5 in "Logan's Run."
--
Kara B.
#21
Posted 03 March 2006 - 11:16 AM
www.iheartfw.com
#22
Posted 03 March 2006 - 11:03 PM
The Methodist Church at the top of Florence Street (as you have depicted) is a great Fort Worth example of memorable design complemented with a favorable site to allow pedestrians to enjoy to enjoy the design. To me, this kind of positioning helps to give a structure more "landmark status" Going on top-of-mind memory, here are a few other memorable Fort Worth structures enhanced by their sites --
(1) Pier One (viewed from westbound Belknap)
(2) Cook Children's Hospital (end of street)
(3) Intermodal Terminal (end of Ninth)
(4) T&P* (end of Throckmorton)
(4) Saint Pat's (end of 14th)
(5) Tarrant County Court House (end of Main)
(6) The entrance to the new public library (end of street)
(7) Saint Stephen's Church (hilltop end of street)
(8) Arlington Heights HS (hilltop and end of street)
(9) Polythechnic HS (hilltop and end of street)
(10) Burnet Plaza* (view looking west on 7th)
* less than full view
Putting a building at the end of an axis is an old architectural trick to indeed give the building a "landmark status". It is also good urban design and planning. If you can put it on a hilltop in addition to the axial alignment, that is even better. I would say that the Tarrant County Courthouse actually fits into that category by being on the bluff. Even though I love the pedestrian friendly view of the front of the Courthouse on axis with Main through downtown, I even think it is more dramatic when coming from the north by looking up the Paddock Viaduct to the rear of the Courthouse on the hill.
Even though the Convention Center Arena is not the most attractive building, it is aligned with Main Street directly opposite of the Courthouse. It even puts greater importance on the axis when each end of it is anchored by a landmark. This trick was not the first time that it was used in Fort Worth. The original T&P Passenger Station sat at the end of Main Street south of Lancaster. The distance between the Courthouse and the T&P was approximately one mile.
#23 G. O. Todd
Posted 04 March 2006 - 06:06 AM
The Methodist Church at the top of Florence Street (as you have depicted) is a great Fort Worth example of memorable design complemented with a favorable site to allow pedestrians to enjoy to enjoy the design. To me, this kind of positioning helps to give a structure more "landmark status" Going on top-of-mind memory, here are a few other memorable Fort Worth structures enhanced by their sites --
(1) Pier One (viewed from westbound Belknap)
(2) Cook Children's Hospital (end of street)
(3) Intermodal Terminal (end of Ninth)
(4) T&P* (end of Throckmorton)
(4) Saint Pat's (end of 14th)
(5) Tarrant County Court House (end of Main)
(6) The entrance to the new public library (end of street)
(7) Saint Stephen's Church (hilltop end of street)
(8) Arlington Heights HS (hilltop and end of street)
(9) Polythechnic HS (hilltop and end of street)
(10) Burnet Plaza* (view looking west on 7th)
* less than full view
Putting a building at the end of an axis is an old architectural trick to indeed give the building a "landmark status". It is also good urban design and planning. If you can put it on a hilltop in addition to the axial alignment, that is even better. I would say that the Tarrant County Courthouse actually fits into that category by being on the bluff. Even though I love the pedestrian friendly view of the front of the Courthouse on axis with Main through downtown, I even think it is more dramatic when coming from the north by looking up the Paddock Viaduct to the rear of the Courthouse on the hill.
Even though the Convention Center Arena is not the most attractive building, it is aligned with Main Street directly opposite of the Courthouse. It even puts greater importance on the axis when each end of it is anchored by a landmark. This trick was not the first time that it was used in Fort Worth. The original T&P Passenger Station sat at the end of Main Street south of Lancaster. The distance between the Courthouse and the T&P was approximately one mile.
Great point about the original T&P. Brings up another good question. The original structure at that site burned, however I recall from a post-fire photo that the east-end of the building (including the Victorian-styled tower) was still standing.
Question is -- Isn't it too bad that somebody didn't persuade the FWFD to save/repurpose that extraordinary part of the structure? Remember that the Brits were able to save selected building fragments after WWII bombings (Salsbury Cathedral?), and the Berliners saved selected bombed out church fragments. I can't say whether or how these were repurposed or if they were actually meant to be war memorials. No matter. The fragments had a certain historical significance and architectural significance to each of the communities. I'm sure there were lots more examples of this.
Perhaps there were non-apparent considerations -- structural damage or other -- that the city had to take into account in the decision not to save the T&P tower. Otherwise, I think saving it would have been a good thing to do. Lots of modern FDs actually build towers to use as training facilities.
Also, the photos I have seen of the post-fire ruin gave me no clue as to how that fragment was aligned with Main Street. Could be that it was so far off center that it wouldn't have been visable from the Courthouse.
Any thoughts on this?
#24
Posted 04 March 2006 - 03:47 PM
G.O., The T&P Passenger Terminal was constructed at the intersection of Main and Front Streets around 1900. It sustained a massive fire in 1904 and was subsequently rebuilt. It continued to serve as the passenger terminal for the T&P until a grander and larger facility was constructed across Main to the west in 1931. These buildings within that complex remain today. I may be wrong, but I think the old terminal was demolished in 1944.
For the actual location, I would encourage you to view The Jack White Collection of Historic Photographs from the University of Texas at Arlington. This site is hosting the online versions of Jack's pictures. From what I could tell in the photos that Jack has donated so far, the tower of the building was directly on axis with Main. I also looked at the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and their drawings show the tower also aligned with the center of the street. I know that it doesn't appear as if the tower could be aligned, but you have to remember that the streets have all been realigned in that area, as well. I have seen photos looking south on Main, and the tower is indeed visible from the street. Check out this link. The 1918 Panorama taken from the dome of the Courthouse shows the T&P in the far distance at the end of Main Street.
#25 G. O. Todd
Posted 04 March 2006 - 04:47 PM
Drklts, it is perfectly OK with me to use my photographs within the forum without permission! If you use my photos on other forums, all that I ask is that I get credit as the photographer.
G.O., The T&P Passenger Terminal was constructed at the intersection of Main and Front Streets around 1900. It sustained a massive fire in 1904 and was subsequently rebuilt. It continued to serve as the passenger terminal for the T&P until a grander and larger facility was constructed across Main to the west in 1931. These buildings within that complex remain today. I may be wrong, but I think the old terminal was demolished in 1944.
For the actual location, I would encourage you to view The Jack White Collection of Historic Photographs from the University of Texas at Arlington. This site is hosting the online versions of Jack's pictures. From what I could tell in the photos that Jack has donated so far, the tower of the building was directly on axis with Main. I also looked at the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and their drawings show the tower also aligned with the center of the street. I know that it doesn't appear as if the tower could be aligned, but you have to remember that the streets have all been realigned in that area, as well. I have seen photos looking south on Main, and the tower is indeed visible from the street. Check out this link. The 1918 Panorama taken from the dome of the Courthouse shows the T&P in the far distance at the end of Main Street.
#26 G. O. Todd
Posted 04 March 2006 - 05:00 PM
Drklts, it is perfectly OK with me to use my photographs within the forum without permission! If you use my photos on other forums, all that I ask is that I get credit as the photographer.
G.O., The T&P Passenger Terminal was constructed at the intersection of Main and Front Streets around 1900. It sustained a massive fire in 1904 and was subsequently rebuilt. It continued to serve as the passenger terminal for the T&P until a grander and larger facility was constructed across Main to the west in 1931. These buildings within that complex remain today. I may be wrong, but I think the old terminal was demolished in 1944.
For the actual location, I would encourage you to view The Jack White Collection of Historic Photographs from the University of Texas at Arlington. This site is hosting the online versions of Jack's pictures. From what I could tell in the photos that Jack has donated so far, the tower of the building was directly on axis with Main. I also looked at the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and their drawings show the tower also aligned with the center of the street. I know that it doesn't appear as if the tower could be aligned, but you have to remember that the streets have all been realigned in that area, as well. I have seen photos looking south on Main, and the tower is indeed visible from the street. Check out this link. The 1918 Panorama taken from the dome of the Courthouse shows the T&P in the far distance at the end of Main Street.
Amazing revelation, John. In all these years, I have never realized that the original T&P endured until 1944. Given that the Victorian tower was so picturesque, it's surprising that I've never seen a photograph made after the 1918 parade pic.
Nonetheless, it's easy to see how the new T&P (1931) could easily the Victorian original and steal all the attention in that segment of the city. To me, the 1931 T&P is absolutely an irreplaceable architectural gem and symbol of Fort Worth's history.
#27
Posted 04 March 2006 - 08:21 PM
We soo need to bring back a REVIEW to DTFW. Parade floats and all. How bout we try to coordinate such a feat.
The RETURN of the REVIEW July 1st, 2006. Maybe '07?
What d'ya say?
Smoggy FW even back then.
www.iheartfw.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users