Tarrant County Law Center Designs
#1 bsteele
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:50 PM
Can someone please grab the designs and post them to the forum ? I'm not the most pc literate of people.
http://www.dmsas.com
at the main menu select -
details -
project types -
institutional -
and then scroll down to the bottom of the list to find the designs for the law center
#2 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:50 PM
Floor Plan:
#3 tcole
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:51 PM
#4 Sam B Stone
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:51 PM
#5 Kevin Lehnhardt
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:51 PM
#6 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:52 PM
#7 Urbndwlr FW
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:52 PM
Will the facade be whitish as the drawing suggests, or will it be pink like the courthouse? Will they tear down that courthouse annex that has the trompl'oil work on it?
But, yes, I agree. I like the design. It does look very DC. I think that's good. Those designs have withstood the test of time.
#8 Urbndwlr FW
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:53 PM
#9 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:53 PM
#10 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:53 PM
#11 Thurman52
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:54 PM
On my Saturday afternoon drive, I noticed the construction appears to be moving now. I watched them as they constructed their tower crane.
#12 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:54 PM
#13 BB
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:55 PM
#14 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:55 PM
#15 BB
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:55 PM
#16 renamerusk
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:56 PM
In the "What were they thinking" category, Arlington has just outrageously dropped the ball. What was once a postcard quality view of the Ballpark in Arlington from I-30 has been ruined by a building which is utterly uncomplimentary to the baseball stadium. Why was this allowed to happen?
#17 ghughes
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:56 PM
#18 Buck
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:56 PM
"Postcard quality views" do not generate tax revenue.
#19 renamerusk
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:56 PM
As far as your suggestion that postcard views do not generate tax revenue, perhaps Arlington and you need only look at what has been done in Southlake to realize what could be done.
I agree with a previous thread which suggested that Arlington was in a state of desperation to keep the company from moving to FW and consequently allowed the developer free and unfettered range. Of course, now all that is needed is a string of Chick-a-fils, Whataburgers, Check Cashers and a Nail Salon.
#20 jonnyrules23
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:57 PM
================
Paschal rules!!!
#21 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:57 PM
#22 salvag
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:58 PM
#23 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:58 PM
#24 jonnyrules23
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:59 PM
================
Paschal rules!!!
#25 John T Roberts
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:59 PM
#26 dismuke
Posted 16 April 2004 - 06:59 PM
#27
Posted 16 April 2004 - 11:51 PM
#28
Posted 17 April 2004 - 11:39 AM
#29 Nick
Posted 17 April 2004 - 11:57 AM
#30
Posted 19 April 2004 - 08:37 PM
Edited by John T Roberts, 19 April 2004 - 09:09 PM.
#31
Posted 25 June 2004 - 03:30 PM
#32
Posted 26 June 2004 - 06:57 PM
#33
Posted 26 June 2004 - 07:39 PM
#34
Posted 26 June 2004 - 08:09 PM
#35
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:25 PM
#36
Posted 01 July 2004 - 07:08 PM
#37
Posted 02 July 2004 - 11:41 AM
#38
Posted 02 July 2004 - 01:40 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users