My understanding is that yes, in some ways the AHNA has caused the Hulen/Camp Bowie intersection to be more suburban in style (and therefore lifeless).
The story as I recall hearing it is as follows:
The City (and perhaps Camp Bowie District Inc) worked to originally designate the area around Hulen and Camp Bowie as one of the Fort Worth's Urban Villages. That meant mixed use (MU) zoning, and if any new buildings were to be constructed, those would have to be built close to the streets, with more traditional, pedestrian-friendly design and the parking would have to be screened and located behind the buildings.
I understand the AHNA fought the designation and ultimately Hulen & Camp Bowie was removed from the Urban Village program.
One result (if i have historical timing correct) is the Walgreens that was built. It would have been required to be built up at the corner, with doors facing the streets, parking located behind. Instead, the result was a conventional suburban-style building with a parking lot on the corner, rather than a building.
I don't know for sure if the AHNA directly lobbied for that site plan but my understanding is it is a result of their general opposition to anything "urban" in any way. I dont know the individuals who led it so I can't speak to their actual concerns but I do wonder why in the world they would have argued AGAINST the traditional design principals embodied in the Urban Village program and Mixed Use zoning.
It is such a sad missed opportunity to correct that corner (it used to have a grocery store with an even larger parking lot) - and bring a building to the corner, making it feel and act so much friendlier to pedestrians, even if most people arrive to Walgreens by car.
Surely someone else on the forum has a better grasp of how that went but wanted to share the version I have heard from multiple people who were closer to the matter many years ago.