Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Quik Trip zoning case very near Central Market

Arlington Heights Gas Stations Traffic Sprawl

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Voz

Voz

    Newcomer

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 March 2015 - 02:38 PM

Quik Trip is looking to build a new location at 3400 Hulen, just south of the Central Market on Hulen. I'm trying to gauge the local business, traffic, and home value impacts of something like this but not sure where to grab data on that.  I'm hoping this forum's collective wealth of knowledge might be able to steer me in the right direction.



#2 jefffwd

jefffwd

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 23 March 2015 - 02:45 PM

Although I do love QT...  I am totally against a QT in this location.  I live in East FW/Hurst (the land of the QTs). 



#3 JBB

JBB

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dirty suburbs

Posted 23 March 2015 - 03:44 PM

Is it finally happening? QT has been rumored for that stretch of Hulen for almost as long as they've been doing business in Texas. It seems like a strange location given that they're usually located at major intersections or along larger thoroughfares. That area already gets a lot of traffic so I can't imagine it being worse. I also can't see it looking any worse than the gas station/convenience store that already sits across from that lot.

#4 Dylan

Dylan

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburbia

Posted 23 March 2015 - 09:31 PM

Although I do love QT...  I am totally against a QT in this location.  I live in East FW/Hurst (the land of the QTs). 

 

Why? Looks like auto-centric suburbia on Google Maps.


-Dylan


#5 mmiller2002

mmiller2002

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Hi Mounttttt
  • Interests:Born 1959
    HS Grad 1977
    1982 BSEE Penn State

Posted 24 March 2015 - 11:40 AM

That location seems wrong due to the twisty, hilly street and would make the left turns into a high traffic QT dangerous.



#6 JBB

JBB

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dirty suburbs

Posted 24 March 2015 - 11:51 AM

That's actually on the section of street that's pretty flat and straight. There's also a signal at that intersection.

#7 cberen1

cberen1

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,303 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 24 March 2015 - 01:49 PM

I think that will make hulen a traffic nightmare with people trying to turn left into the store and those trying to head north out of the store.



#8 Voz

Voz

    Newcomer

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 March 2015 - 03:14 PM

A little more background, this is not the first time QT has tried to come to this area.  I'm told they tried a few years ago to secure the site that the McDonald's and QuikSak share just a block north of their new proposed site.  The neighborhood associations from Alamo Heights and Sunset Heights scuttled it though.

 

I'd attach the proposed siteplan if I could figure out how to attach a document to the post.  But some of the concerns for the area are:

  • Fuel truck delivery routes - They can't travel down Hulen so they have to cut through neighborhoods, either yours, ours, or both;
  • Hulen congestion - There's no entrance to the QT on Hulen so that means people must turn in on Diaz or Houghton (likely Diaz since that's where the light is).  Regardless, Hulen will become more congestion.
  • Additional cut-through traffic - With Hulen more congested, traffic cutting through both of our neighborhoods will be significantly increased.  For Alamo Heights, this could impact all streets between (and including) Ashland and Clover as well as Diaz and Donnelly.
  • Road degradation - Regardless of whether it's increased traffic in cars or heavy trucks through our neighborhoods, the roads will be negatively impacted meaning more wear and tear on residents' cars.

It's unfortunate because I'd love a QT in that area but that's negative site for the neighborhoods.  Hopefully they can find a better site in the area.



#9 Voz

Voz

    Newcomer

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 March 2015 - 03:17 PM

That area already gets a lot of traffic so I can't imagine it being worse. I also can't see it looking any worse than the gas station/convenience store that already sits across from that lot.

 

Not sure if you recall the period of time when construction of the Hulen bridge was ongoing; traffic can get much worse on Hulen.

 

And yes, that QuikSak nearby is an eyesore.  It's up for sale but it's always been up for sale.  I suppose the bright side of QT going in next door is that it'd shut that store down.



#10 JBB

JBB

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dirty suburbs

Posted 24 March 2015 - 03:30 PM

I have no dog in this hunt at all, but I would have to say it isn't the best location. I have to think that if they're intent on having a location on Hulen, somewhere south of the bridge might be a better option.

#11 youngalum

youngalum

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 26 March 2015 - 11:38 AM

I believe the quicksak location is a surface lease only.



#12 McHand

McHand

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 763 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Parks of Deer Creek
  • Interests:music, neighborhoods, kids, education, biking, politics, urbanism, food, friends, family

Posted 26 March 2015 - 07:27 PM

 

Although I do love QT...  I am totally against a QT in this location.  I live in East FW/Hurst (the land of the QTs). 

 

Why? Looks like auto-centric suburbia on Google Maps.

 

 

 

It is....technically.  It's one of the old first-ring streetcar suburbs. 


Voice & Guitars in Big Heaven
Elementary Music Specialist, FWISD

Texas Wesleyan 2015
Shaw-Clarke NA Alumna

 

 

#13 Dismuke

Dismuke

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,098 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth
  • Interests:Late 19th/early 20th century history, popular culture architecture and music. Collecting 78 rpm records from the 1900 - 1930 era.

Posted 27 March 2015 - 11:16 AM

My guess is QT is interested in the area because that part of town is very under served in terms of gas stations.  Basically, there is the Shell at Montgomery and I-30 which, as far as I have generally observed, is one of the most expensive gas stations I regularly go past.  There is a gas station with a very small number of pumps at the Murder 7-11 on Camp Bowie  and, last I recall seeing, the old Mobil on Camp Bowie still sold gas, through I think it is full service.  Not many options on the south side of the freeway either - and my guess is most people there go to the Shell as well.

 

I probably won't go to the QT at the proposed location as I only occasionally go down Hulen much further than Central Market.  But I sure would welcome some sort of competition that would draw traffic away from that Shell.   That is the gas station I almost always use despite its high prices simply because of its convenient location which I go past every time I get on I-30 to head to work.  My free time is too limited to make it worth my while to go through the extra hassle of exiting the freeway someplace else for no other reason than to save a buck or two on a tank of gas.  But there are occasions when I actually end up having to wait for an open pump at that Shell - which I find particularly annoying and completely defeats the purpose of my buying gas there in the first place.   So if QT can draw away some of the traffic from the Shell and eliminate those occasions, I would regard that as a good thing.  And if the extra competition results in them having to knock their prices down a bit - that would also be a good thing.


Radio Dismuke
1920s & 1930s Pop & Jazz
24-Hour Internet Radio
www.RadioDismuke.com


#14 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 27 March 2015 - 11:29 AM

... And if the extra competition results in them having to knock their prices down a bit - that would also be a good thing.

 

I chat regularly with the store manager at Krogers and he admits to me that he checks daily AM & PM with gas prices at QT before setting his own retail price for gasoline.



#15 John T Roberts

John T Roberts

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,407 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Fort Worth
  • Interests:Architecture, Photography, Bicycling, Historic Preservation

Posted 03 April 2015 - 05:18 PM

The Zoning Case for the QuikTrip will be heard by the Zoning Commission at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, April 8th.  This will be the public's chance to speak either for or against this project.  If you miss this, another opportunity will be to go before City Council when it is on their agenda.  (Providing the Zoning Commission approves the case.)  The City Council meeting will be at night.



#16 Voz

Voz

    Newcomer

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 April 2015 - 01:44 PM

The QuikTrip zoning case was approved today.

 

Out of curiousity, does anyone know what it takes to get a zoning case rejected by the commission?



#17 John T Roberts

John T Roberts

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,407 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Fort Worth
  • Interests:Architecture, Photography, Bicycling, Historic Preservation

Posted 08 April 2015 - 03:01 PM

Usually a lot of neighborhood opposition will kill a zoning case, but not always.  Your neighborhood still has a chance to present to City Council, but it will take even more people who are against the project to show up and speak.  Even then, Council will probably already have their minds made up.



#18 Jimmy

Jimmy

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 257 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:76116

Posted 13 May 2015 - 07:57 AM

Buried in a story about lake levels, Caty Hirst of the Star-Telegram had a blurb about QT losing their zoning request.  Article states that QT attempted to build a store in the vicinity in 2007, as well.

 

LINK.



#19 JBB

JBB

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dirty suburbs

Posted 13 May 2015 - 08:06 AM

That's great news for the neighborhood. I think the lot where McDonald's ended up was the location they originally wanted.

#20 John T Roberts

John T Roberts

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,407 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Fort Worth
  • Interests:Architecture, Photography, Bicycling, Historic Preservation

Posted 13 May 2015 - 03:21 PM

I read that in the paper today.  I was going to post a link to the article, but I didn't have time this morning.  I think this is great for the neighborhood and I also think that JBB is correct in the location where they were looking to build previously.  I think that was on the current McDonald's site.



#21 Voz

Voz

    Newcomer

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 May 2015 - 02:35 PM

JBB is correct, the 2007 attempt was at the lot that both McDonald's and QuikSak currently occupy.  There will continue to be development pressures on the area, which we think is wonderful, but hopefully they'll include proposals for something a bit more neighborhood-friendly than a gas station.



#22 mmiller2002

mmiller2002

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Hi Mounttttt
  • Interests:Born 1959
    HS Grad 1977
    1982 BSEE Penn State

Posted 15 May 2015 - 11:23 AM

That strip of hulen doesn't need any more reason to have traffic turning left...







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users