DT: Two CityPlace
#1
Posted 27 February 2006 - 09:05 AM
Tandy Center's Owner Switches Plan After Landing Four-Floor Tenant
By Connie Gore
Last updated: February 24, 2006 07:30pm
FORT WORTH-With class A office space at a premium, the three-year owner of the 1.2-million-sf Charles D. Tandy Center has nipped a plan to go all condo in a $100-million redevelopment of the two-tower CBD landmark. With a just-signed, 10-year lease, a 320,000-sf tower is undergoing a $35-million, class A upgrade.
David Porter, president of PNL Cos. of Dallas, has done the about-face after landing a 65,000-sf, four-floor lease with Range Resources Corp. The landmark's retooling has just ramped up so Range Resources can get in the door in first quarter 2007, Porter tells GlobeSt.com.
Porter says the deal for floors nine through 12 went full circle in three months. "They needed to find another block of space Downtown," he says. "They had a few options, but I think they were intrigued by what we were doing."
Fort Worth has one of, if not the, tightest CBD office markets in the state. "It was very important for our employees to be able to stay Downtown," Rodney Waller of Range Resources says in a press release. The firm offices at 777 Main St., which reportedly didn't have enough space to meet Range Resources' expansion requirement. Jack Huff and Kyle Poulson with Huff Partners represented Range Resources.
PNL bought Tandy Center at 100 Throckmorton St. in December 2001 from its long-time owner, RadioShack Corp., which has since relocated to a $200-million-plus headquarters at the CBD's edge. PNL's Sundance Square centerpiece will be renamed to City Place. The 320,000-sf North Tower has been dubbed Two City Place. The South Tower, which will still be converted into condos, will be branded as One City Place.
Porter's renovation plan calls for all glass to be replaced with energy-efficient panes; mechanical, elevator and common area upgrades; 300 parking spaces to complement a 400-space garage; and 10,000 sf of retail, including a US Post Office. An existing mall area will be gutted and brought back as parking and retail in a redesign that is now under way. When that's done, Porter says he will ramp up work on the residential tower.
Porter has been sitting on a final decision about the North Tower about 18 months. He repeatedly said the decision would rest on the market--and a 6.7% office vacancy in the Downtown apparently was the decisionmaker.
#2
Posted 27 February 2006 - 10:47 AM
#3
Posted 27 February 2006 - 04:26 PM
From GlobeSt.Com
Fort Worth has one of, if not the, tightest CBD office markets in the state. "It was very important for our employees to be able to stay Downtown," Rodney Waller of Range Resources says in a press release. The firm offices at 777 Main St., which reportedly didn't have enough space to meet Range Resources' expansion requirement.
I wonder how many other businesses have expressed interest in downtown but had no building to accommodate them and gave up on FW? More towers ya'll!
#4
Posted 27 February 2006 - 08:56 PM
NEWS RELEASE: For immediate release
Range Resources signs as anchor tenant in conversion of Tandy
Center’s North Tower to Class A Office
Conversion adds 300,000 square foot of much-needed office space to downtown Fort
Worth
FORT WORTH, TX (February 24, 2006) – Office tenants in the very tight
downtown Fort Worth market now have a new option to consider. PNL Fort
Worth, L.P. has announced its plans to fully renovate 100 Throckmorton Street,
the 320,000 foot North Tower of the former Tandy Center, to Class A office space.
Range Resources Corporation (NYSE:RRC) will be the anchor tenant for
approximately 65,000 square feet in the mid-level of the tower, excluding
expansion options.
“Range is one of the most exciting public companies in Tarrant County
and we are very pleased to kick off our leasing of the project with a growing
tenant of this size and caliber,” said David Porter, President of PNL.
Range Resources is an oil and gas exploration and production company
with a market capitalization of $3.2 billion. It is moving from 777 Main Street
which does not have vacant space to accommodate its growth. “It was very
important for our employees to be able to stay downtown,” said Rodney Waller
of Range Resources. “This move will put us in a building more central to
Sundance Square, the heart of downtown, as well as looking out on the new
Trinity River Vision development.” Waller estimates the move will give Range
Resources one and a half to two times the amount of space they occupy
currently.
The company will take four mid-rise floors in the tower that was Radio
Shack’s headquarters before the company moved to its new riverfront campus in
2005.
Range Resources was represented in the selection of its new national
headquarters by Jack Huff and Kyle Poulson of Huff Partners. The lease is the
largest office relocation in downtown in over a year. “Range Resources has
outgrown their current space, and the Tandy Center redevelopment provides the
best block of available Class A space in one of the most ideal locations in our
city,” Poulson said. “Everything was right about this transaction, including the
timing for everyone involved. Range Resources was able to secure the site they
wanted and will be involved in the finish out of the floors to meet their needs
and desires. Occupancy should occur in about a year.”
Though PNL will continue with plans to convert the South Tower into
condominiums, the ultimate use of the North Tower as office space was only
recently set in response to the strong demand for Class A office space in
downtown Fort Worth. The overall redevelopment is estimated to cost over $100
million and will be renamed City Place, with the South Tower condominiums
becoming One City Place and the North Tower office being redeveloped as Two
City Place.
The $35 million redevelopment of Two City Place to Class A standards is
anticipated to include the following improvements:
• Replacement of all glass with energy efficiency double-pane glass
installed flush with the exterior frame of the building.
• Full upgrade of heating and air conditioning HVAC systems
• Renovation of restrooms including ADA access
• New exterior finishes on the bottom floors of the building
• Addition of a rooftop architectural feature with dramatic illumination
• Creation of approximately 300 new parking spaces, in addition to the
existing 400 space garage
• Demolition of the Throckmorton overhang, which will open up the north
end of Throckmorton Street
• Approximately 10,000 square feet of retail space including a US Post
Office
• Construction of a private landscaped motor court the width of a full city
street on the south side of the tower
• New floor elevator lobbies and all new main lobby
• Sprinklers installed throughout the entire building (recently completed)
• Abatement of asbestos (currently under way)
• Elevator upgrades
The decision to renovate the North Tower as office will require some
redesign of the central block between the motor court to the north and the to-be-
reopened Second Street to the south. Once this final design work is completed
PNL will be ready to commence demolition of the Mall for parking and retail
and kick off the renovation of the South Tower to residential condominiums.
#5
Posted 27 February 2006 - 09:32 PM
#6
Posted 27 February 2006 - 09:58 PM
#7
Posted 27 February 2006 - 10:10 PM
Ha!!!
Anybody ever see the bathrooms on the upper floors? I had the occasion to go up to the 19th of the south tower. I went in to go to the bathroom and thought I walked back into a deep 70's time warp. UGLY orange tile from floor to ceiling. I don't think they touched the bathrooms since they built the towers.
#8
Posted 04 March 2006 - 10:39 AM
#9
Posted 01 April 2006 - 12:35 PM
http://www.fortworth...lay.php?id=4732
Lighting features will also be added to the top of the building and the base of the office tower will be re-clad up to 40 feet high.
In the mean time, Porter said he has had several discussions with potential tenants.
#10
Posted 01 April 2006 - 02:16 PM
Wonder why they haven't been looking into the Cityplace.
www.iheartfw.com
#11
Posted 02 April 2006 - 04:55 PM
Here's another article, from the BizPress, nothing new really, but a few little details stuck out.
http://www.fortworth...lay.php?id=4732
I like this quote from the article:
"Porter added that an additional tower could be constructed between the two existing towers to serve as a second phase for residential development constructed at the corner of Second Street and Throckmorton."
#12
Posted 19 June 2006 - 06:53 PM
#13
Posted 19 June 2006 - 07:25 PM
#14
Posted 25 June 2006 - 01:40 PM
Looks like they have started replacing the windows on the Westside of the tower. I would have expected construction fencing etc. The plywood in the window caught my eye coming back from lunch.
Kinda sad if plywood over a few windows get Fort Worth folks hopping.
#15
Posted 22 July 2006 - 11:48 AM
Looks like they have started replacing the windows on the Westside of the tower. I would have expected construction fencing etc. The plywood in the window caught my eye coming back from lunch.
There is some serious Crane action taking place today. Looks like things are about to speed up.
Can't wait to see the new oval crown and the new green glass.
#16
Posted 22 July 2006 - 12:05 PM
#17
Posted 27 July 2006 - 09:27 PM
DG06-67 100 Throckmorton Street, City Place Two
Owner/Applicant: PNL Fort Worth/Gideon Toal
Architects
Requests a Certificate of Appropriateness to
install:
1. New exterior plaza, which includes paving,
shade trees, and a planter with an integrated
water feature;
2. New landscaping including shade trees;
3. New paving;
4. New street lighting; and
5. New exterior lighting
2nd Case is for, temporary banners (ads I bet) and construction barriers for nine months, I guess this means they are preparing to start work
#18
Posted 27 July 2006 - 09:30 PM
#20
Posted 02 August 2006 - 09:41 PM
#21
Posted 04 September 2006 - 11:33 AM
#22
Posted 04 September 2006 - 11:56 AM
The new glass is a big improvement over the old, in my opinion. From the renderings, I'm looking forward to the progress on the old Tandy Towers, which in their natural form have never been particularly attractive to me.
--
Kara B.
#23
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:18 PM
Even tho the windows are less reflective, them being being out to the face of the building will make the tower more glassy than the current concrete look.
#24
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:27 PM
Other than the shade of glass, the windows seem to look the same style as the old. Why not save money and push out the current glass? Kinda seems like a waste of windows to discard it all even tho there is nothing wrong with them. Isnt it too expensive to change glass just for "personal taste" rather than functionality?
#25
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:02 PM
#26
Posted 05 September 2006 - 10:30 PM
www.iheartfw.com
#27
Posted 08 September 2006 - 09:02 PM
I noticed today that the new glass really is dramatically less reflective than the old. You can now easily see through the glass to the interior, and in fact out the other side in cases where you can see such angles. It really does change the character of the building.
--
Kara B.
#28
Posted 09 September 2006 - 12:01 AM
#29
Posted 09 September 2006 - 11:28 AM
#30
Posted 29 September 2006 - 10:03 AM
#31
Posted 29 September 2006 - 03:28 PM
#32
Posted 07 November 2006 - 02:43 PM
#34
Posted 13 November 2006 - 07:33 AM
We saw this permit listed a month ago for construction related activies. Does anyone know if this is for DEMO of the mall or is this other phases?
Northbound lane of Taylor was closed off this weekend. I was caught this morning, I typically sneek down Taylor to avoid the crowds on Throckmorton.
We saw this permit listed a month ago for construction related activies. Does anyone know if this is for DEMO of the mall or is this other phases?
#35
Posted 01 December 2006 - 07:44 AM
Here's the article and photo
#36
Posted 01 December 2006 - 09:10 PM
I read that painting the tower/s will begin next week. Hmm…
Interesting article!
MesoPursuers.com
C. Perkins
#37
Posted 02 December 2006 - 12:17 PM
Today's S-T article (I saw it online) says a new model of the plan calls for both towers to look slightly different...
Here's the article and photo
They keep updating what thier going to do. But I see no real new news? Other than it looks like just one tower will have the oval crown? To bad. And that thier going to have a wait and see before going forward to build a new 20 story office tower. I just hope someone builds 1000ft tower and deal with office space for good and lets move on.
#38
Posted 03 December 2006 - 02:56 AM
#39
Posted 03 December 2006 - 08:03 AM
I think the twin towers should remain twins. Although different uses for each one, anyone else think it makes any sense to make them each different from each other??? Just curious
I think it makes sense to make them distinctively different. Since the street is bisecting the project with residential on one side and office on the other, I don't have a problem witht them being different. Actually, I was having a problem with them being identical but having different uses but that's just me.
#40
Posted 03 December 2006 - 10:55 AM
I always picture them as little outdated twins.
I might have to play with that new look on the comp. If I get it done, I will share it with you guys.
MesoPursuers.com
C. Perkins
#41
Posted 03 December 2006 - 12:38 PM
#42
Posted 03 December 2006 - 11:42 PM
If one started to slide what would stop them?
Are there no guidelines on a rail or something along the edge (code)?
Kind of creepy (long Fall)!!
MesoPursuers.com
C. Perkins
#43
Posted 04 December 2006 - 09:50 AM
Anyway... disappointed to see that they are not following the original plans, I am left wondering however if the third tower gets built, will it match the residential or office building. I think that may be the best answer to go ahead and change up the appearances of both and then build the third one to match one of the buildings so you have a new set of twins that are closer together.
#44
Posted 04 December 2006 - 10:53 PM
Both of these buildings are very clean on top. The North Tower virtually has no equipment on top, except for the satellite dish, the stack going through the penthouse, and the penthouse itself. There are no cooling towers on the roof because they are placed on top of the parking garage toward Throckmorton & Belknap. The South Tower has a few exhaust fans and one vent stack. The cooling towers on this building are located within a recessed well inside part of the top floor. Office space surrounds the mechanical well. A vertical ladder leads from this well up to the main roof.
Current codes now require at least one stair in a building to have direct access to the main roof.
#45
Posted 27 January 2007 - 02:52 PM
#46
Posted 27 January 2007 - 08:18 PM
#47
Posted 28 January 2007 - 10:42 PM
Perkins, back in the 1970's, building codes did not require rails, or walls to keep people from falling off of a roof. This type of construction was very common for concrete framed buildings constructed during that time period. I believe current building codes now require at the minimum a rail around any rooftop equipment that are within 10 feet of the edge of a roof. If a roof has a parapet of at least 42 inches, then no rails are required on the roof.
Both of these buildings are very clean on top. The North Tower virtually has no equipment on top, except for the satellite dish, the stack going through the penthouse, and the penthouse itself. There are no cooling towers on the roof because they are placed on top of the parking garage toward Throckmorton & Belknap. The South Tower has a few exhaust fans and one vent stack. The cooling towers on this building are located within a recessed well inside part of the top floor. Office space surrounds the mechanical well. A vertical ladder leads from this well up to the main roof.
Current codes now require at least one stair in a building to have direct access to the main roof.
That is very interesting info Mr. Roberts! I find it hard to believe that the "roof" safety issues were not that effective all the way to the 70's!
I look at that roof and it creaps me out!
MesoPursuers.com
C. Perkins
#48
Posted 16 March 2007 - 01:05 PM
#49
Posted 16 March 2007 - 01:51 PM
Does anyone know when One City Place will have its grand opening or debut its sales center? Or have models open? I can't find a schedule anywhere.
Since the office market reported such high occupancy, the South Tower seems to have become less active and the focus has been on the North Tower. Several months ago construction was going on the sales center about mid block on 3rd street. But I haven't seen it open.
#50
Posted 16 March 2007 - 03:29 PM
Does anyone know when One City Place will have its grand opening or debut its sales center? Or have models open? I can't find a schedule anywhere.
Since the office market reported such high occupancy, the South Tower seems to have become less active and the focus has been on the North Tower. Several months ago construction was going on the sales center about mid block on 3rd street. But I haven't seen it open.
Thanks!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users