Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Redesign for Burnett Park


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 vjackson

vjackson

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 15 January 2007 - 11:45 AM

Burnett Park might be redesignedBy SANDRA BAKER
Star-Telegram Staff Writer
FORT WORTH -- Burnett Park, the 3-acre park at the base of the 40-story Burnett Plaza office tower in downtown Fort Worth, may be redesigned.

Downtown Fort Worth Inc. and the city's Parks Department have agreed to work together to make the park more usable, but also more cost-efficient to operate.

The design process will be managed by Downtown Fort Worth Inc., and the cost will be underwritten by the Burnett Foundation.

The park was given to the city in the 1950s, but the Burnett Foundation funds its ongoing maintenance.

Downtown Fort Worth Inc. has already contacted Peter Walker and Partners Landscape Architecture, a Berkeley, Calif., firm that last redesigned the park in 1983.

Representatives will be in town Wednesday to walk the park and meet with the Burnett Park Advisory Committee.

The 80-year-old-plus greenscape on Lamar Street, between Seventh and 10th, has been relandscaped and redesigned only a few times.

Its current design is a geometric pattern of sidewalks along a series of small water pools with fountains, in addition to the large planters of flowers and formal tree settings. The granite sidewalks have primarily served as a pass-through.

The park served as the location for a climactic street fight scene in an episode of the Walker, Texas Ranger TV series starring Chuck Norris, with Norris dumping a thug into one of the fountains.

"We hope that the new design will soften the park, making it more usable by the general public and the many residents moving to downtown," Neils Agather, executive director of the Burnett Foundation, said in a statement.

A public hearing will be scheduled for later this year so downtown residents and business owners can offer ideas, Downtown Fort Worth Inc. said. The planning process is expected to be completed by mid-summer, with construction starting soon after.



#2 vjackson

vjackson

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 15 January 2007 - 11:54 AM

QUOTE(vjackson @ Jan 15 2007, 01:45 PM) View Post

"We hope that the new design will soften the park, making it more usable by the general public and the many residents moving to downtown," Neils Agather, executive director of the Burnett Foundation, said in a statement.

In all of my years in DFW, I've never walked through the park. It always seemed like it was mainly for employees of Burnett Plaza, IMO. I think it needs to opened up and made more inviting and more like an actual park and less like an appendage to the office building. Also, I never got the metal pipes sticking out of the ground. When I first saw the fountains, I thought they were still being built.

#3 cbellomy

cbellomy

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Meadowbrook

Posted 15 January 2007 - 01:55 PM

Before the 1983 redesign, Burnett Park was actually quite pretty and inviting. Seems like they used to put the city Christmas tree there back in the 70's. The '83 redesign was awful, IMO, and definitely unpopular. I remember reading lots of angry letters about it in the Star-T back then.

Hopefully they'll take it back to being more of a wooded green space now.


#4 cbellomy

cbellomy

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Meadowbrook

Posted 15 January 2007 - 01:59 PM

Some views of the old Burnett Park can be seen here.


#5 cberen1

cberen1

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,303 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 15 January 2007 - 03:18 PM

QUOTE(vjackson @ Jan 15 2007, 01:54 PM) View Post

In all of my years in DFW, I've never walked through the park. It always seemed like it was mainly for employees of Burnett Plaza, IMO. I think it needs to opened up and made more inviting and more like an actual park and less like an appendage to the office building. Also, I never got the metal pipes sticking out of the ground. When I first saw the fountains, I thought they were still being built.


This is somewhat true, in part because there aren't many other large offices on this side of downtown. Burnett represents most of the people in the immediate area. And there are virtually no ground floor retail establishments. I'm not sure a redesign is going to fix it. There's no parking. It's not very inviting to a passerby. But, it is pretty inviting to the Burnett Plaza tennants.

I actually really like the place The sticks look a little funny in the daytime, but at night (if they're working) they're really neat. Each one has a light inside the pipe. When the light illuminate the bubbling water coming out of the tops, they look like a bunch of candles. There are also lights in the walkways that are pretty subtle. The evening definitely takes the edge off the place.

Maintenance has to be a nightmare. I've never gone a week without seeing something being worked on. They are constantly repairing the fountains, pulling stuff out of the fountains, working on the asian jasmine, etc. On a $/ft. basis, this has to be one of the most expensive parks to maintain in Texas.

#6 vjackson

vjackson

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 15 January 2007 - 04:28 PM

QUOTE(cberen1 @ Jan 15 2007, 05:18 PM) View Post


This is somewhat true, in part because there aren't many other large offices on this side of downtown. Burnett represents most of the people in the immediate area. And there are virtually no ground floor retail establishments. I'm not sure a redesign is going to fix it. There's no parking. It's not very inviting to a passerby. But, it is pretty inviting to the Burnett Plaza tennants.



If they want to attract people to the new park, I would suggest a "dancing fountain" like the one at Fountain Place in Dallas. I work in the building and the fountains that surround the buildings are beautiful, but very loud. But its the dancing fountain that brings people off the streets with cameras in tow. And nothing is funnier than in the summer time when unknowing tourist think the dancing fountain is public and bring their shirtless kids from the Fairmount Hotel next door. It a blast watching the kids run through the fountain, trying to figure out the next water sequence...until one of the surly security guards gives them the boot.

A PUBLIC dancing fountain would be the way to go if you really want the public to use the park...IMO I always thought the Water Gardens could have used some type of dancing fountian, for kids (and us adults) to play in.

#7 cberen1

cberen1

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,303 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 15 January 2007 - 05:02 PM

QUOTE(vjackson @ Jan 15 2007, 06:28 PM) View Post


A PUBLIC dancing fountain would be the way to go if you really want the public to use the park...IMO I always thought the Water Gardens could have used some type of dancing fountian, for kids (and us adults) to play in.


If you read the quote from Mr. Burnett about the park, I think that was his intent. A place to soak your feet on a hot day.

I've always thought that the water gardens could use a vertical fountain. I love falling water, but I would also love to have something shooting up into the air. Maybe that's taboo given the perrennial water shortages around here.

#8 guest

guest
  • Guests

Posted 16 January 2007 - 10:45 AM

I’ve worked on several projects with both SWA landscape architects and Peter Walker and find the only meaningful difference between these two that SWA uses more of a rolly scrolly layout as opposed to Peter Walker’s rectilinear approach. I don’t recall if Burnett Park was designed before or after his divorce to Martha Schwartz, but I don’t see any of her influence in the Park which is very bright colors and interpretive design. The only idea that might have been interpreted here was a business man with his wingtips on a bit too tight with no where to go. This park was definitely not their best effort.

I wrote Mr. Walker a letter humbly suggesting that the Triangle Ranch on the Caprock Escarpment adjacent to the Pease River where Anne Burnett grew up might be considered. If you don’t know much about Anne Burnett this article published by UT Texas is a good start: http://www.tsha.utex...s/TT/ftase.html

The Caprock Escarpment is a geographical transition point between the High Plains/Llano Estacado to the west and the North Central Plains to the East. The escarpment stretches around 200 miles south-southwest from the northeast corner of the Texas Panhandle near the Oklahoma border. It suggests transition which is what Fort Worth is currently about. The change from being the biggest good old boy town that ever was to a modern urban environment. Just my .02 cents.


#9 Now in Denton

Now in Denton

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,069 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth Denton Co.Tx. The new Fort Worth

Posted 16 January 2007 - 03:52 PM

QUOTE(cberen1 @ Jan 15 2007, 05:02 PM) View Post


If you read the quote from Mr. Burnett about the park, I think that was his intent. A place to soak your feet on a hot day.

I've always thought that the water gardens could use a vertical fountain. I love falling water, but I would also love to have something shooting up into the air. Maybe that's taboo given the perrennial water shortages around here.


I like your idea about a shooting fountain. But whats more taboo than the city of Las Vegus. Outdoor swimming dolphins. And the giant water display at the Bellagio. And green golf courses .Green laws in front of peoples houses?. While southern California grows more thirsty?

#10 mbdalton1

mbdalton1

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 179 posts

Posted 18 January 2007 - 06:55 PM

I'm not sure I like the idea of a shooting fountain. Not so peaceful for me. I office caddy-corner to the park on West 7th Street and the park is nice and shady on a warm spring/summer day. The current water feature is more peaceful in my opionion.

Now, softening up the hard angles might be a good idea but I lean toward any design that leaves the park restful and peaceful and shady with some spots of light getting through. It is a good place to go and eat lunch outside or just sit and relax during the work day.

I don't think of it as being a great destination type park with lots of busy, noisy people.

That's just my take on it....

Mary Bess smile.gif

#11 Fort Worthology

Fort Worthology

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 18 January 2007 - 08:35 PM

QUOTE(mbdalton1 @ Jan 18 2007, 06:55 PM) View Post

I'm not sure I like the idea of a shooting fountain. Not so peaceful for me. I office caddy-corner to the park on West 7th Street and the park is nice and shady on a warm spring/summer day. The current water feature is more peaceful in my opionion.

Now, softening up the hard angles might be a good idea but I lean toward any design that leaves the park restful and peaceful and shady with some spots of light getting through. It is a good place to go and eat lunch outside or just sit and relax during the work day.

I don't think of it as being a great destination type park with lots of busy, noisy people.

That's just my take on it....

Mary Bess smile.gif


The Burnett Park redesign was actually mentioned to me several months back by a rep from the Neil P. The gist of the idea is to open up the middle of the park, making it more grassy and inviting for, well, park stuff. Get rid of a lot of the paving, add much more grassy area, that sort of thing. Give it the ability to have picnics or frisbee tossing. His words were to the effect of "make it more residential-friendly, rather than just an office worker's park." Didn't surprise me to hear that the Neil P. folks were apparently in the loop about it, and I agree with the proposal. The old layout seemed a lot better to me than the current one, though the current one isn't bad or anything.

--

Kara B.

 


#12 cberen1

cberen1

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,303 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 19 January 2007 - 01:24 PM

QUOTE(mbdalton1 @ Jan 18 2007, 08:55 PM) View Post

I'm not sure I like the idea of a shooting fountain. Not so peaceful for me. I office caddy-corner to the park on West 7th Street and the park is nice and shady on a warm spring/summer day. The current water feature is more peaceful in my opionion.

Mary Bess smile.gif


I meant that the Water GArdens could use a shooting fountain, not Burnett Park. I like BP just the way it is (minus all the constant maintenence).

#13 texastrill

texastrill

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • Location:EFW

Posted 19 January 2007 - 01:30 PM

How about more artwork?DT in general could use more artwork/sculptures.
T E X A S T R I L L - G O C O W B O Y S

#14 JOCOguy

JOCOguy

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Location:Johnson County Kansas

Posted 19 January 2007 - 10:03 PM

I can remember the Christmas tree and the goldfish pond in Burk Burnett park when I was young. I actually liked it better then than the water park it has now. I hope they restore the pond.

#15 Bernd

Bernd

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 182 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 05:21 PM

QUOTE(texastrill @ Jan 19 2007, 02:30 PM) View Post

How about more artwork?DT in general could use more artwork/sculptures.


Yeah, maybe we could trade the giant Jonathan Borovsky for three or four sculptures of a more inviting and human scale.
The future "best blog" in Fort Worth.

#16 Fort Worthology

Fort Worthology

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 21 January 2007 - 07:53 PM

No way am I going to let anybody take away the Briefcase Man. I love that thing. smile.gif

--

Kara B.

 


#17 FWFF'r

FWFF'r

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth
  • Interests:Hunting, Fishing, Camping, Antiques, Artifacts, History, Rustic Furnishings, Baseball

Posted 12 June 2007 - 10:43 PM

Looking forward to seeing the park redesigned. I formally proposed to my wife there in front of the huge Christmas tree with engagement ring in pocket Dec. 23, 1981. Then the park was mostly shrubby & a good place for the homeless to sleep, but in my opinion, looked better then than now.

Sorry, but I never liked the briefcase man sculpture...

#18 RD Milhollin

RD Milhollin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,945 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 13 June 2007 - 06:37 PM

I think the "Briefcase Man" sculpture would be best resituated as the centerpiece of a public plaza on the block where the CNB/Landmark Bldg. used to be. At Burnet Park it is sort of isolated in a corner of the property, but in the "Crosstimbers Plaza" it would be centrally sited and surrounded by office structures. It just seems to me that the scale of the sculpture would be more complementary to the surroundings, and vice versa, there. It could be mounted on a pedestal in the middle of a fountain with descending steps all around where downtown workers, with or without their own briefcases, could enjoy an outdoor lunch. Three levels of parking underneath of course.

#19 vjackson

vjackson

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 14 June 2007 - 07:19 AM

QUOTE(FWFF'r @ Jun 12 2007, 11:43 PM) View Post

Sorry, but I never liked the briefcase man sculpture...

I've never particularly liked it, but I do agree with Prarie Pup, it might just need to be relocated to make it more appealing. The current location is kind of odd and isolated.

#20 Fort Worthology

Fort Worthology

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 01 August 2008 - 07:35 AM

It's gotten little fanfare, but the redesign of Burnett Park is apparently underway.

They are removing flowers and shrubs as we speak. The plan is to remove the granite planter boxes around the perimeter and replace them with ground-level planters full of flowers I believe. The fountains are all being removed, filled with dirt to be flush with the walkways, and replanted with grass, and the sunken grass between the granite walkways will be removed. Those areas will be raised and made flush with the granite and replanted.

The old Christmas tree will be removed and a new, healthy one put in its place and the fencing removed (I believe). There are also plans for a kid-friendly sculpture play area.

--

Kara B.

 


#21 RD Milhollin

RD Milhollin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,945 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 01 August 2008 - 10:24 AM

QUOTE (Atomic Glee @ Aug 1 2008, 07:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's gotten little fanfare, but the redesign of Burnett Park is apparently underway...

The fountains are all being removed, filled with dirt to be flush with the walkways, and replanted with grass, and the sunken grass between the granite walkways will be removed. Those areas will be raised and made flush with the granite and replanted.


AG, are ALL the fountains being filled in? Seems like it would be good to preserve some water element for the park, being at the edge of West Texas and all. I agree that park doesn't need an acre of shallow water sprinkler mist, but a fountain would be nice.

#22 Fort Worthology

Fort Worthology

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 01 August 2008 - 10:53 AM

QUOTE (Prairie Pup @ Aug 1 2008, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
AG, are ALL the fountains being filled in? Seems like it would be good to preserve some water element for the park, being at the edge of West Texas and all. I agree that park doesn't need an acre of shallow water sprinkler mist, but a fountain would be nice.


When I said "all the fountains," I meant "all the fountains *except* the big one by the wall with the Burnett quote." The wall is staying, and there will be a fountain there - though it is my understanding that the fountain itself will be redesigned within the constraints of the existing wall design.

--

Kara B.

 


#23 Birdland in Handley

Birdland in Handley

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:birdland in handley
  • Interests:Architecture (deco, love that we still have a lot! endangered googie, all other historic) FTW's good photography reputation (Blessed Carter Collection) city parks, local history, vegetarian options, green living.

Posted 02 August 2008 - 01:21 AM

Take Briefcase Man at face value if you like. I like to take him with a dose of irony. And yes, I'd love to have him in my garden.
The park should adapt to less concrete. Perhaps at this time, xeriscape plantings and the most efficient, recirculating water features would be in order. People could learn what xeriscape stuff works best and get ideas for their yards, and know that some times of year, don't be afraid of seeing plants being dormant and brown.
Also, a mad scientist with a really efficient time machine, to put the Medical Arts Building back.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users