The website lists LED edge lighting as a feature of the building. A few dusk renderings have been released showing a band of light coming from the offset in the building slab where the glass will be cantilevering outward on the office levels that matches the offset in the parking levels.
The height of the building is comparable to the roof of the old Landmark Tower, which even with the clock removed, still made an impact on the skyline until it was demolished. I still think it will make an impact on our skyline when it is completed.
I am sure that Jetta would have liked to have purchased the old Star-Telegram Annex, but I'm pretty sure that Morningstar Oil & Gas wouldn't sell. Also, they would have lost quite a bit of their space with taking out five levels of the annex, plus three levels of building over 6th Street. Not only would they have lost a lot of square footage, it would be difficult to remove the bridge portion of the building and then the 6th Street façade of the 1948 addition would have to be rebuilt.
There is an interesting twist to the story about allowing the old Star-Telegram Annex to remain. If you remember in previous threads, I have explained why parts of the Carnegie Building's southern façade do not have any windows. Current building codes do not allow any openings in a building where the walls butt up against an adjoining piece of property. Therefore, at the east and west parts of the Carnegie's façade there aren't any windows. The center section of the building is set back, and if you are greater than 5 feet away from a property line, you are allowed protected window openings. The further away a wall is from the property line, the lesser amount of protection is required until you are far enough away for no protection. If you look at the rendering taken from 777 Main, it shows the south wall of both the tower and the parking levels with glass. It also shows the east wall of the parking garage with a metal screen. These would be unprotected openings. The way that the developer was allowed to do this was to have the entire block re-platted into one piece of property and to enter a condominium arrangement with Morningstar for the old Star-Telegram Annex. In the eyes of the city, both buildings now sit on the same piece of land. Therefore, by the International Building code, the only separations that had to be made were for what is required between two buildings, not two pieces of property. This allows for windows to be installed on the south side of the building, all the way up.
More floors were added to Burnett Plaza because more tenants committed to lease the space while the building was still on the drawing board. It also may have been that these tenants required more space than what was originally planned, so to keep them, the developers had to increase the height. Burnett Plaza had commitments from the First National Bank, Meridian Oil, and Champlin Petroleum, and I think one other major tenant. Adding more floors was done while the building was being designed; therefore, it was relatively easy to do.
Once a building is designed and is under construction, it is not easy to add height to the building. The structure is designed to handle what is being built. A good example of trying to do this after part of the building was built was the old Landmark Tower. I'm quite sure that the change in the design once the first four floors and two basement levels were built was part of the reason the building was ultimately demolished. Since the Frost Tower is half way up, it is really too late to add any more floors.