The design is really terrible. Looked through the architect's work on its site and I understand why. Really gimmicky, sloppy stuff across the board. This is an example of arbitrarily busy facade design. I see no design logic other than "just get it done, produce units that work, and hit the budget". And I don't think its a matter of cost. They (or perhaps another architect) could have made this much cleaner and more logical, even if limited to the identical material palette, size, window size and pattern, and balconies.
I'd start with eliminating those gray rectangular sections that protrude for no reason, the clumsy cream-colored rectangular thing at the corner entry, and the wickety-wack design on the parapets/horizontal elements. (What is the term for the horizontal moldings - some on parapets, others lower - as well as the little beady things that stick down a bit?)
This is a rare case where I'd prefer to see that site remain vacant rather than have a bad building occupy it for 40+ years.