Preferred Local News
#51
Posted 01 March 2006 - 11:20 AM
www.iheartfw.com
#52
Posted 07 March 2006 - 10:29 AM
My wife usually tunes into the Channel 5 news by default, and I never fail to point out a segment that is usually based on some "story" or fad that was circulating on the internet earlier in the week! I mean, they must have one guy who just surfs the web and says "Hey guys! I found something for you to talk about! Some guy made a list of how you can reach the operator quicker on corporate 800 numbers!"...
#53
Posted 07 March 2006 - 02:38 PM
And Now In Denton can think Gov. Perry for creating that job. J/K!
I TOTALLY agree about how these news stations get their TEASE WORTHY news from the internet about 3 days later. BREAKING NEWS does not exist anymore for local TV stations. I get my CNN on, my Bloomberg, MSNBC, and of course the HOLY GRAIL of stations, ESPN. During campaign season and important national or international events and crisis, I get my C-SPAN on.
If I want to watch a car chase being ensued, I go to a special website cam for that or watch FOX News (non-local). Cable news and ala carte stations "KILLED THE LOCAL NEWS STAR."
Little news SECRET: (Whispering) News stations only care about the ratings or viewership when the sweeps are in, and will ALWAYS tease their WEATHER FORECAST. No news channel shows their locals (weather forecast) early in the show. WINK!
That is why the WEATHER CHANNEL trumps these fools. ACCUweather.com is another great resource for local weather and forecast.
Plus, I cannot stand it when a segment will include a "for more information regarding, or to hear more about this and other stories..." they make you LOG-IN to their own website to get information for the stories OWN WWWEBLINK. Just TOTALLY disinterests me from then on.
And I hope they are reading this.
www.iheartfw.com
#54
Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:34 PM
#55
Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:38 PM
www.iheartfw.com
#57
Posted 09 August 2006 - 03:45 PM
Somebody tell that CASTILLO guy that he is only doing high school sports highlights because he MOST LIKELY will not have to stand on top of a peach basket during his FRIDAY NIGHT interviews. HEEE HEEHEE! I made a funny.
www.iheartfw.com
#58
Posted 10 August 2006 - 09:20 PM
#59
Posted 11 August 2006 - 09:55 AM
#60
Posted 11 August 2006 - 10:27 AM
#61
Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:13 PM
#63
Posted 11 August 2006 - 05:28 PM
I'm not sure we're lucky enough for Hansen to retire anytime soon.
#64
Posted 11 January 2007 - 11:11 AM
#65
Posted 11 January 2007 - 01:09 PM
For a good laugh, go read the Texas TV board on Radio Info and see all the WFAA haters screaming about how the whole venture is a pointless waste of money.
#66
Posted 11 January 2007 - 01:31 PM
For a good laugh, go read the Texas TV board on Radio Info and see all the WFAA haters screaming about how the whole venture is a pointless waste of money.
I can see why some would say it's a waste of money. It definitely wasn't something that was necessary. I think Channel 8 is mainly after the visability. Being in Victory with a studio like that will undoubtedly make them the most visable news program in the metroplex. And the studio and news LCD screen will become part of the Dallas "culture" and a new landmark for the city. When you see promos for Dallas now, BELO's channel 8 studio will probably be shown. As much as I dislike BELO as a company, it has been a good corporate citizen for Dallas.
#67
Posted 11 January 2007 - 02:06 PM
#69
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:17 PM
This weeks Weekly story ? Illegal allian heath care! Good Grief. And just last week I was talking to a African American lady. And her cousin died in the lobby at JPS last year waiting and waiting all d@#%m day for her turn. What about the native poor born in the city? Or the poor topless bar owner being forced out to make way for the Trinity River Vision. The Fort Worth Weekly is a anti-establishment paper. Yet they gladly take the "Establishment" money. Printing ads for thos high end condos in DT Fort Worth.
And I would also say Chris Heinbaugh. Of Channal 8 is a mouthpiece for Dallas City Hall. He did a series about the Dallas bond package. Never giving opponants an opportunity to have thier say. He was showing his personal support for the bond package. He sounded like the Mayor Miller. So no I never trust just one news outlet ever.
#70
Posted 11 January 2007 - 04:09 PM
Why do you continue to read a free paper you find so awful. You seem to know every story they print. The Weekly isn't awful because it's left leaning, IMO. It's awful becaue of poor writing and boring stories. The restuarant reviews read as if they were written by a 5th grader. The Weekly was owned by New Times a comany that owns several "alternative" weeklys, including the Dallas Observer. And the FW weekly was the worst one. It was purchased by one guy, can't remember his name, a few years ago. I don't know if he still owns it, but the writing and stories seem to have gotten worse.
#71
Posted 11 January 2007 - 08:31 PM
Editorially, the Weekly is really two different publications: news in the front, and entertainment in the back. As a news publication the Weekly is a pretty solid publication, however unapologetically liberal it may be. Betty Brink in particular is a terrific reporter. They also act as the only real counterweight to the 7th Street Gang -- if it weren't for the Weekly's reporting, the corruption and waste emanating from the Trinity River Vision would likely never have had any light shed upon it. When TRV turns out to be the world's most expensive toxic mud puddle, at least it won't come as a complete surprise to everyone.
The back of the book is a different deal altogether. I think Kristian Lin is a decent enough film critic, and Chow, Baby is consistently written with real flair. Otherwise, the entertainment writing is mostly poor and largely uninformed/disinterested about happenings in FW. As this is the real reason most people read alt weeklies, I consider this a real shame.
#72
Posted 11 January 2007 - 09:06 PM
#73
Posted 11 January 2007 - 11:33 PM
#74
Posted 12 January 2007 - 01:12 PM
Now is not the time to hold hands and sing kum ba yah. But.. facts and truth are the first casualty by both sides who have extreme views. If the 7th street gang or the FWWeekly have extreme views either way it is not balanced. And the people of Fort Worth will be the ones hung out to dry.While the papers go one to live and write another biased day.
As a former extreme right winger myself. Knowing seeing and getting older. I hold a lean right of center position. In other words both extreme left and right views are nuts! Unapologetically liberal? Lord help us!
#75
Posted 12 January 2007 - 05:34 PM
Balance is a myth. A mirage. It never actually exists.
What's left is writing with an honest point of view. This used to be the norm in the newspaper business. In Dallas, the Morning News covered the news from the pro-business pro-establishment perspective while the Times-Herald worked from the point of view of the little guy (and gal). In Fort Worth, it was the Star-Telegram doing the bidding of the 7th Street Gang while the Press covered things from the POV of the working person. If you wanted balance, you read both. Simple enough.
Today, if you want balance on television, you have Fox News on the one hand and one hour of MSNBC programming (Countdown with Keith Olbermann) on the other. What would be delightful would be if both reported facts as honestly as possible, with ideological slant admitted and accounted for. The outlets that strive to straddle the fence, like CNN, end up doing he-said/she-said journalism that tells the reader the facts and the lies, but with no way of distinguishing between the two. It's worthless.
But if you want balance in print, you can read the Star-Telegram and the Weekly and figure out where the middle ground lies. In Dallas, it's pretty similar with the News and the Observer. But asking one publication to pretend to cover all angles is really asking it to be fundamentally dishonest. The publisher always has a point of view, and the publication will always reflect it. There's nothing wrong with that as long as the publication is open and honest about it.
As for my contention that TRV is building the world's most expensive toxic mud puddle, I admit that it's conjecture on my part, a bit of literary license to assume that's how it's going to turn out. But I'll also tell you that it's very hard for me to imagine it ever being any other way. Stagnant lake water in a drainage basin surrounded by concrete equals some pretty nasty water pollution. I've seen nothing in their plans to make me think this will be any different. But I guess we're gonna find out whether we like it or not.
#76
Posted 13 January 2007 - 10:56 AM
^^^^
It was purchased by one guy, can't remember his name, a few years ago. I don't know if he still owns it, but the writing and stories seem to have gotten worse.
he still owns it.
I have been in several cities served by New Times publications and I guess I've never thought of them as an actual news resource. I suppose I've always thought of them as strictly entertainment. Someone has to poke the most sensitive issues without encomberances of fact-checking, right? Someone has to sniff out a conspiracy....somewhere,,,,, If there isn't one, we just need a more imaginative nose.
Reading posts from last year........I agree that John Mcaa has the most significant mustache. It seems to have it's own gravitational force over-stabilizing the upper lip.
And, if the sheer repetition of the phrase "Arctic Blast" is any indicator, local news is for enterianment only too.
#77
Posted 15 January 2007 - 09:01 AM
#78
Posted 15 January 2007 - 10:44 AM
Was I the only one who got sick of the constant weather coverage by all of the news stations this weekend?? How many #@!! times can you say the same thing. No national news, no local news, no sports, not even the latest on Brittney Spears!!! I'm sure she was somewhere without here underwear this weekend.
I'm right there with you Vjack, how many ways can you say it's cold, and ice may be on the bridges and overpasses. geewizz.
#79
Posted 15 January 2007 - 10:46 AM
#81
Posted 16 January 2007 - 06:48 PM
Denton,
Balance is a myth. A mirage. It never actually exists.
OK.
Well, a better way to put it would be that balance is something a reader achieves by reading/watching/listening to multiple outlets with multiple points of view. No single publication can realistically reflect multiple POVs.
#82
Posted 17 January 2007 - 08:19 AM
I think they (weather people) should give up forecasting and just do what they do best, explain why the weather we had yesterday happened. Except possibly summer - we can all forecast that - "Hot, humid, sunny."
#83
Posted 17 January 2007 - 08:29 AM
#84
Posted 17 January 2007 - 09:38 AM
I just gotta snicker about the weather thing -- How many times this winter has David Finfrock told us it was gonna snow and absolutely nothing happened; then last night, he said we MIGHT get a few small flurries in certain areas. So I wake up this a.m. and everything is white.
I think they (weather people) should give up forecasting and just do what they do best, explain why the weather we had yesterday happened. Except possibly summer - we can all forecast that - "Hot, humid, sunny."
Snicker me too!! Total surprise this morning.
I like the idea of reporting yesterday' weather! Please pass that along as a sure-fire way to get it right every day.
#85
Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:12 AM
I drove by the Channel 8 studios last night. All I can say is "wow"!! There's simply nothing like that in Texas. I saw the story the station did last night. And once Victory is up and running, game nights are going to be incredible!!! Also I can't wait for the AFI film festival this spring. Watching movies on those screens is going to really be something to see. I've always favored Channel 8 news, so now I have more of a reason to watch.
I was very impressed with the studios look. Can we be lucky and get some station to build one in DTFW
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users