Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Crystal Springs on the River

River Oaks New development on West Fork

  • Please log in to reply
103 replies to this topic

#51 Jeriat

Jeriat

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,088 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SWFW

Posted 07 January 2016 - 08:32 AM

We've sometimes complained about apartment buildings being ugly or cookie cutter on here, but Lake+Flato is looking to break that mold with the apartment here. This looks fantastic. Click on the picture for more.

 

 

RES_CrystalSprings-5-1920x795_zpsszncnit

 

Wow... that looks spectacular. 

spongebob1.gif


7fwPZnE.png

 

8643298391_d47584a085_b.jpg


#52 hannerhan

hannerhan

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 869 posts
  • Location:Ft Worth

Posted 07 January 2016 - 08:40 AM

Not thrilled about the notion of a parking lot on the river.  Otherwise, looks good.



#53 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 07 January 2016 - 09:47 AM

Not thrilled about the notion of a parking lot on the river.  Otherwise, looks good.

 

If a natural berm could be constructed to screen the cars from the river, then that would lessen the impact of the parking lot.



#54 RD Milhollin

RD Milhollin

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,945 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 07 January 2016 - 02:21 PM

 

Not thrilled about the notion of a parking lot on the river.  Otherwise, looks good.

 

If a natural berm could be constructed to screen the cars from the river, then that would lessen the impact of the parking lot.

 

 

If it was constructed would it be natural?

 

Actually I would advocate for the opposite. Any parking located within x number of meters from a running waterway should have sufficient swales constructed to allow runoff to collect and drain slowly, allowing oil and other pollutants to absorb into the ground and be decomposed by natural bacterial action. If a berm is constructed between the swale and the river, allowing overflow from catastrophic rain events of course, we might both be happy.



#55 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 07 January 2016 - 05:51 PM

 

 

Not thrilled about the notion of a parking lot on the river.  Otherwise, looks good.

 

If a natural berm could be constructed to screen the cars from the river, then that would lessen the impact of the parking lot.

 

 

If it was constructed would it be natural?

 

I don't know; maybe you can determine that for yourself after reading the following.  And I don't know about the runoff, just what was being inferred about the less than thrilling notion of a parking lot next to the river.

 

http://www.extension...soil_berms.html



#56 elpingüino

elpingüino

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 24 February 2016 - 04:10 PM

Truck Yard food truck park to open at Crystal Springs this fall, D Magazine reports.



#57 BlueMound

BlueMound

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,260 posts

Posted 24 February 2016 - 05:47 PM

Fantastic!
Very cool place + good food

#58 BlueMound

BlueMound

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,260 posts

Posted 25 April 2016 - 07:26 PM

Updated article on the Truck Yard at Crystal Springs

http://www.guidelive...ding-fort-worth

#59 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 01 June 2017 - 05:38 PM

Been a while without anything on this. I think it should be breaking ground in coming months. 

 

Here's two new renderings of the apartments

 

VTxz1PC.jpg

 

9fO0opJ.jpg



#60 elpingüino

elpingüino

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 20 August 2018 - 07:21 PM

In today's Star-Telegram article about the closing of the Clearfork Food Park, they also report that the Crystal Springs Truck Yard "won't happen."
https://www.star-tel...navlink=SecList

#61 panthercity

panthercity

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 312 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 20 August 2018 - 09:23 PM

In today's Star-Telegram article about the closing of the Clearfork Food Park, they also report that the Crystal Springs Truck Yard "won't happen."
https://www.star-tel...navlink=SecList



Thats a bummer, the Truck Yard is a really cool spot. Hopefully the one planned for the stockyards is similar.

#62 M2guy

M2guy

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 78 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 August 2018 - 11:08 PM

In today's Star-Telegram article about the closing of the Clearfork Food Park, they also report that the Crystal Springs Truck Yard "won't happen."
https://www.star-tel...navlink=SecList


Thats a bummer, the Truck Yard is a really cool spot. Hopefully the one planned for the stockyards is similar.

Agreed, love going to Truckyard. Was hoping it would become reality after clearfork closed. Heres to seeing what the stockyard brings

#63 BlueMound

BlueMound

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,260 posts

Posted 21 August 2018 - 01:03 AM

Dang, I was really looking forward to Chicken Scratch.
I swear, their chicken fingers are the best Ive ever had.
Maybe we can get a Chicken Scratch in the new Stockyards development.

http://cs-tf.com/chicken-scratch-2/

#64 Cody C

Cody C

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 57 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Byers, 76107

Posted 21 August 2018 - 09:18 AM

Anyone know if this project (Crystal Springs) is still happening?



#65 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 21 August 2018 - 09:21 AM

My understanding is that it won't.

#66 Doohickie

Doohickie

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,029 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Hills

Posted 21 August 2018 - 10:30 AM

Well that's a shame.


My blog: Doohickie

#67 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 21 August 2018 - 10:50 AM

At some point "Crystal Springs" was replaced by a more generic "Future mixed use" on the River District's website. They haven't posted on social in 2 years. They started to break ground around 2 years ago. I never heard a reason for the issue. It may be on hold but I've heard otherwise. I'll ask around and see if I can find out more.

 

It's a shame too because it seemed really well designed, hopefully a future developer sticks with Lake|Flato.



#68 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 07 December 2018 - 02:58 PM

Back on? LVG investments doing some zoning changes.

 

 

The proposed site is located on the corner of Roberts Cut Off and White Settlement Road. The applicant is requesting to amend PD 724 in order to adjust and clarify the development standards and remove the site requirement. The site plan has been amended several times throughout the years as the design is reconsidered. Removing the site plan requirement will allow flexibility for the design as the layout of the site is adjusted. Crystal Springs is proposed to be developed in three phases with commercial and entertainment on the western side near the river and mixed use and multifamily on the center and eastern sections. Multiple rezonings have occurred along White Settlement Rd. in the past several years to Mixed-Use to take advantage of the central city location and proximity to the Trinity River.

 

Here's a big of a site plan, below is a list of uses,

 

v6f14VO.jpg

 

 

 

Allowed Uses

In addition to the uses allow within the Low Intensity Mixed-Use (MU-1) District in Chapter 4,
Article 8, and the supplemental standards of Chapter 5, the following were added:
Entertainment and Eating
Bar, tavern, cocktail lounge;
Club private or teen
Club, commercial or business
Lodging
Hotel, motel or inn less than 1,000 feet from any residential district
Retail sales and services
Farmers market
Temporary uses
Vendor, transient.
Development Standards
Lot 1, Block 1
1. Fences and gates - waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet.
2. Transient Food Vendors may stop for more than 60 consecutive minutes at any one location to
sell or serve food provided however this shall not apply to Mobile Vendor Foot Courts.
3. More than one (1) mobile vending unit per individual tract, parcel or platted lot shall be allowed.
5. Request to waive 4.1300, (d), (4) Setbacks.
6. Request to waive 6.300 © Bufferyard and Supplemental Building Setback and ARTICLE 13, 4.1300,
(f), (1), d. transitional height plane when adjacent to one- or two-family district.
Lot 1, Block 2
1. Fences and gates - waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet.
3. Transient Food Vendors may stop for more than 60 consecutive minutes at any one location to
sell or serve food provided however this shall not apply to Mobile Vendor Foot Courts.
4. More than one (1) mobile vending unit per individual tract, parcel or platted lot shall be allowed.
5. Request to waive 4.1300, (d), (4) Setbacks.
6. Request to waive 6.30 © Bufferyard and Supplemental Building Setback and ARTICLE 13, 4.1300,
(f), (1), d. transitional height plane when adjacent to one- or two-family district.
Lot 1, Block 3 (Future Lot 1R, Block 3)
1. Fences and gates - waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet. 
2. Request to waive 6.300 © Bufferyard and Supplemental Building Setback and ARTICLE 13,
4.1300, (f), (1), d. transitional height plane when adjacent to one- or two-family district.
Lots 1-2, Block 4 (Future Lots 1R and 2R, Block 4)
1. Fences and gates – waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet.
Lot 1, Block 5 (Future Lot 1R, Block 5)
1. Fences and gates – waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet.
2. Allowable height of five (5) stories, shall be allowed without office, eating, and entertainment,
and/or retail sales and services being 10 percent or more of the building’s gross floor area.
3. Front of Building – to allow one additional story (to total 6 stories) where a lot slopes downward
along front property line rather than away from the property line.
4. Request a maximum allowable density of 70 units per acre for single use.
5. Request to waive 6.300 © Bufferyard and Supplemental Building Setback and ARTICLE 13, 4.1300,
(f), (1), d. transitional height plane when adjacent to one- or two-family district.
1. 6.201 (B), (2) Request to waive 100% parking maximum.
Lot 1, Block 6 (Future Lot 1R, Block 6)
1. Fences and gates – waiver to allow for walls that can (1) extend beyond building facades and (2)
be taller than four feet.
2. Allowable height of five (5) stories, shall be allowed without office, eating, and entertainment,
and/or retail sales and services being 10 percent or more of the building’s gross floor area.
3. Front of Building – to allow one additional story (to total 6 stories) on the west side of the building.
4. Request a maximum allowable density of 70 units per acre for single use.
5. Request to waive the 125 linear feet building entry minimum requirement.
6. Request waiver of the street level entry/stoop requirement primary street frontage.
7. Request to waive 100% parking maximum.


#69 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 14 December 2018 - 11:21 AM

Evidently LVG is out, the new developer is Dallas Based Stillwater Capital, who have partnered with Fort Capital.  The plan seems to be mostly the same layout, apartments on the east and more retail and entertainment on the west side along the river. They don't have all the details knocked out on the retail side though. 

Here are a couple blurry screengrabs from the zoning hearing, 

 

DGZy4fo.png

 

3iNmK3E.png

 

In addition, Stillwater has a rendering on their website which shows everything with a bit more clarity,



#70 Mr_Brightside526

Mr_Brightside526

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 229 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burton Hill Trinity Trails
  • Interests:Fort Worth

Posted 14 December 2018 - 11:51 AM

Does this mean there are now two large developments going in near the corner of Robert's Cut Off Rd and White Settlement?



#71 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 14 December 2018 - 02:31 PM

Does this mean there are now two large developments going in near the corner of Robert's Cut Off Rd and White Settlement?

 

Pretty much. Everything in this thread is labeled "future mixed use", future apartments across the street isn't something with any details yet.

TRD-Masterplan-10.19.18-For-Website.png



#72 txbornviking

txbornviking

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,373 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arlington Heights

Posted 14 December 2018 - 04:24 PM

White Settlement Rd deserves it's own frequent bus route, Ridgmar to Downtown!



#73 rriojas71

rriojas71

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belmont Terrace - Historic North Side
  • Interests:Real Estate, RE Development, Geography, Team Sports, Restaurants, Urban Exploring, Gaming, Travel, History

Posted 15 December 2018 - 10:13 AM

Glad to see this development rise from the ashes

#74 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 21 February 2019 - 12:37 PM

A realty group has a page up with new renderings and details. Breaking ground May, they say.

 

https://vireore.com/...crystal-springs

 

 

• 10,000 SF Restaurant

• 9,000 SF Retail
• 20,000 SF Creative Office
• 388 Units Multifamily
 
yCjRXef.jpg
 
GrLjaDS.jpg
 
3wnoCPc.jpg


#75 txbornviking

txbornviking

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,373 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arlington Heights

Posted 21 February 2019 - 01:50 PM

 

A realty group has a page up with new renderings and details. Breaking ground May, they say.

 

https://vireore.com/...crystal-springs

 

 

• 10,000 SF Restaurant

• 9,000 SF Retail
• 20,000 SF Creative Office
• 388 Units Multifamily
 
yCjRXef.jpg
 
GrLjaDS.jpg
 
3wnoCPc.jpg

 

 

Why, dear Lord, would they duplicate the mistake of the Pappa's Brothers restaurants off Forest Park by having the parking lot overlook the river rather than the restaurant or housing components?



#76 rriojas71

rriojas71

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belmont Terrace - Historic North Side
  • Interests:Real Estate, RE Development, Geography, Team Sports, Restaurants, Urban Exploring, Gaming, Travel, History

Posted 21 February 2019 - 03:04 PM

I agree 100% with you Viking...  and even more strange is that they have the Trinity Trails going through the parking lot.  I'm sure that is a mistake on their part.



#77 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 21 February 2019 - 03:45 PM

Why, dear Lord, would they duplicate the mistake of the Pappa's Brothers restaurants off Forest Park by having the parking lot overlook the river rather than the restaurant or housing components?

 

 Excellent observation. 

 

 Apparently, cars are people too...and would enjoy lounging along the riverbank as say a diner might.

 

 Really, what is going on in the heads of these site planners?



#78 Dylan

Dylan

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,351 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburbia

Posted 21 February 2019 - 03:52 PM

The restaurant on the left has a patio that wraps around the opposite side of the building from the river.


-Dylan


#79 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 21 February 2019 - 04:01 PM

The river is the asset and the draw - "Crystal Springs on the River". 

 

Every opportunity to place humans near the river should be the priority to take advantage of the enjoying a view an obstructed view of the river; not a parking lot inserting itself between the river and people.



#80 rriojas71

rriojas71

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belmont Terrace - Historic North Side
  • Interests:Real Estate, RE Development, Geography, Team Sports, Restaurants, Urban Exploring, Gaming, Travel, History

Posted 22 February 2019 - 11:18 PM

So I’m assuming the music venue portion of the project has been scrapped since I see no mention of it

#81 bclaridge

bclaridge

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:West of DTFW
  • Interests:Photography, Fashion

Posted 23 February 2019 - 05:24 AM

I really hope Crystal Springs gets off this time around.  I don't like the parking lot facing the river though, unless it is intended to be a trailhead for the Trinity Trails.

 

Now only if the redevelopments could expand north, across the city line, into River Oaks proper.  I don't think too many people there want redevelopment, but some form of redevelopment is inevitable (including residential redevelopment due to rising land values, like what is happening in Westworth Village) as long as the River District keeps developing in the Fort Worth city limits.


Sydney B. Claridge

Proud Horned Frog (TCU Class of 2017) and lifelong Fort Worth resident with a hobby interest in urban planning and design.

Please consider following my Instagram page!  I take a lot of pictures of scenery and urban environments, in addition to my interests in fashion.


#82 Urbndwlr

Urbndwlr

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,668 posts
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 13 March 2019 - 10:31 PM

Hopefully they keep the trees in River Oaks if/as new homes replace old ones.



#83 arch-image

arch-image

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 243 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ft Worth
  • Interests:Gary Morgan - Historical preservation, zoning and growth issues, Serious but not professional photographer, been in construction and design since late 70's

Posted 16 March 2019 - 10:28 AM

Awful site layout. It seems they are trying to keep a "courtyard effect" more central to the restaurants and such and I get that but as mentioned this means you get a parking lot with the views of the river. Mirror imaging the site seems like would be a better layout which would put the parking adjacent to the other sites lot, may be to much in one area for the city planners, but would move all the shops to the river side at least. 



#84 renamerusk

renamerusk

    Skyscraper Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,662 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth South

Posted 16 March 2019 - 09:41 PM

Awful site layout. It seems they are trying to keep a "courtyard effect" more central to the restaurants and such and I get that but as mentioned this means you get a parking lot with the views of the river....

 

A car will go into the river someday for sure. :P



#85 hannerhan

hannerhan

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 869 posts
  • Location:Ft Worth

Posted 14 February 2020 - 10:45 AM

I just saw the Stillwater Capital pitch book for the apartment building.  Renderings are unchanged from what Austin55 sent out in Dec 2018.  Looks like they're still rounding up the equity check but they have financing in place.  Underwriting to $1.90 per foot rents.  



#86 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 16 April 2020 - 10:56 AM

Crystal Spring's apartments have been filed in TDLR. GFF is the archiect. Here is their multifamily portfolio.

 

 

Project Name:Crystal Springs Apartments

Facility Name:Crystal Springs Apartments
Location Address:5320 White Settlement Road Fort Worth, TX 76114
Start Date:4/27/2020
Completion Date:4/27/2022
Estimated Cost:$49,114,179
Type of Work:New Construction
Type of Funds:This project is privately funded, on private land for private use.
Scope of Work:New construction of 397 apartment units with associated site work
Square Footage:400,764 ft


#87 CrimsonBuilders

CrimsonBuilders

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 92 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 22 April 2020 - 01:33 PM

 

Crystal Spring's apartments have been filed in TDLR. GFF is the archiect. Here is their multifamily portfolio.

 

 

Project Name:Crystal Springs Apartments

Facility Name:Crystal Springs Apartments
Location Address:5320 White Settlement Road Fort Worth, TX 76114
Start Date:4/27/2020
Completion Date:4/27/2022
Estimated Cost:$49,114,179
Type of Work:New Construction
Type of Funds:This project is privately funded, on private land for private use.
Scope of Work:New construction of 397 apartment units with associated site work
Square Footage:400,764 ft

 

I'm glad it is finally moving forward. I introduced GFF to this deal like 4 years ago. Wasted two years of my life trying to make this project happen lol. I wonder if LVG is still involved at all? 



#88 hannerhan

hannerhan

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 869 posts
  • Location:Ft Worth

Posted 22 April 2020 - 03:44 PM

I just know that the equity was only 11% of the deal that Stillwater was pitching (70% bank debt, 19% mezzanine, if I remember correctly).  Right now if I was equity in that deal I'd be scared to death.



#89 CrimsonBuilders

CrimsonBuilders

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 92 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Worth

Posted 27 April 2020 - 03:38 PM

Just confirmed that LVG is out and that Stillwater Capital self performs their work. Hope it goes well.



#90 johnfwd

johnfwd

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,293 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:southwest
  • Interests:Running, bicycling, bowling, nightclub life, science, technology.

Posted 29 April 2020 - 05:55 AM

Aside from the low-profile Crystal Springs Apartments, GFF is also the architect for the 12-story residential tower planned at the 1000 Weatherford site on the northwest side of downtown.

 

https://gff.com/view/1000-weatherford/



#91 rriojas71

rriojas71

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belmont Terrace - Historic North Side
  • Interests:Real Estate, RE Development, Geography, Team Sports, Restaurants, Urban Exploring, Gaming, Travel, History

Posted 29 April 2020 - 01:19 PM

Aside from the low-profile Crystal Springs Apartments, GFF is also the architect for the 12-story residential tower planned at the 1000 Weatherford site on the northwest side of downtown.

 

https://gff.com/view/1000-weatherford/

There is a thread for this already...  Also, it is a 12 story tower on top of a 5 story pedestal so in actuality it is 17 stories



#92 John T Roberts

John T Roberts

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,407 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Fort Worth
  • Interests:Architecture, Photography, Bicycling, Historic Preservation

Posted 29 April 2020 - 07:15 PM

I'm sure he was aware there is a separate thread for 1000 W. Weatherford.  I think he was just making a point that the architects were the same firm.



#93 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 30 April 2020 - 08:18 AM

Ground has broken.



#94 elpingüino

elpingüino

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts

Posted 22 August 2020 - 02:12 PM

Fort Worth apartments are being built at a storied location: Gangsters and music stars once hung out on the site of new rental community

JSBRZ2HULBCTRFDAGMD6WFIXGQ.jpg

#95 rriojas71

rriojas71

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belmont Terrace - Historic North Side
  • Interests:Real Estate, RE Development, Geography, Team Sports, Restaurants, Urban Exploring, Gaming, Travel, History

Posted 23 August 2020 - 08:32 PM

I am glad this area has been taking some steps to becoming something worthwhile, but I am so not a fan of Fort Capitals design aesthetics.  I'm not even sure if this is one of there's but it has all the ingredients.  Pitched roof, weird overhang, grey and brown color scheme, bland design.  



#96 johnfwd

johnfwd

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,293 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:southwest
  • Interests:Running, bicycling, bowling, nightclub life, science, technology.

Posted 24 August 2020 - 08:49 AM

Yes, it's a bland design.  But not out of the mainstream of modern apartment complexes being built in and around Fort Worth...maybe with a few exceptions.



#97 Thurman52

Thurman52

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edwards Ranch

Posted 18 January 2021 - 02:05 PM

Tower crane up.  Caught me by surprise today



#98 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 18 January 2021 - 08:28 PM

Excited to see this one starting to rise. Loads of potential to pull of a proper river/trail-oriented-development.

 

mEo91Tc.jpg



#99 hannerhan

hannerhan

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 869 posts
  • Location:Ft Worth

Posted 19 January 2021 - 08:50 AM

There are going to be a lot of disappointed people when everyone realizes that "Phase II" is what connects the site to the river, and it's not being developed yet.



#100 Austin55

Austin55

    Skyscraper Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,693 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Southside

Posted 24 April 2021 - 07:37 PM

Hard to see what's going on with the site from the street, but an aerial view shows it off some more.

 

DKGeVD2.jpg







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: River Oaks, New development on West Fork

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users