Anyone know what the project is on the west side of Hulen just north of the new bridge? Looks like a pre cast garage going up on the back of the site with foundation work for something else in front. Did I miss a discussion on here?
#1
Posted 01 November 2013 - 08:23 AM
#2
Posted 01 November 2013 - 10:43 AM
Apartments
#5
Posted 03 November 2013 - 08:18 AM
#6
Posted 04 November 2013 - 12:26 PM
All market rate
correct
#7
Posted 06 May 2014 - 08:19 PM
Lazy car window picture.
#8
Posted 06 May 2014 - 09:43 PM
Thanks for shooting this. I have been by there recently, but I didn't have my camera.
#9
Posted 07 May 2014 - 07:51 PM
Lazy car window picture.
Anyone else feel like this is a little... out of place?
#10
Posted 08 May 2014 - 11:15 AM
Odd location. I wouldn't want to like there. Traffic and trains.
#14
Posted 11 May 2014 - 02:32 AM
looks out of place till it's filled.
#15
Posted 11 May 2014 - 06:24 AM
I think this is the location of a former retirement village......the building looks no different than anything else going up these days...also, they missed a nice design opportunity by obliterating the hill the former structure was built upon. To the left you can see the big retaining wall used to hold up the remainder of that hill......maybe they did that for sound and visual control from the railroad yard, though vertical penetration on that side of building would have done a similar thing.
#16
Posted 11 May 2014 - 10:36 AM
The units that were there were the Hulen Place Apartments. For the most part, they went up with the hillside. However, I do think there were some retaining walls where the apartments abutted the residential area and the office buildings next door. They were past their prime, and even though these look average, at least they are increasing the density in the area.
- McHand and RenaissanceMan like this
#17
Posted 12 May 2014 - 11:12 AM
That location is where the retaining wall blew out onto the ramp and Vickery a little while ago and they had to do some fancy engineering to hold it back.
#18
Posted 12 May 2014 - 12:09 PM
I remember when the retaining wall collapsed.
#19
Posted 13 May 2014 - 06:19 AM
You can easily tell which section of the wall collapsed and was replaced. The one section that is smooth is where it collapsed. The concrete blocks that are on the rest of the wall is where the existing wall was reinforced.
#20
Posted 30 June 2014 - 12:01 PM
An idea of the color pallet and materials.
#21
Posted 22 July 2014 - 11:45 AM
I contacted them a couple times to find out the pricing and floor plans....i've never ever heard back from them.
#22
Posted 30 August 2014 - 07:34 PM
Little further along, nearly done. Stone looks nice.
#23
Posted 29 September 2014 - 08:23 AM
Prices and floorplans are up:
http://www.4000hulen.com/
Prices range from $941-$2,575. Square footage ranges from 600-1409. A little background on the project can be found here:
http://www.thompson-...g.php?id=54&h=2
FYI, I'm not associated with any party in the project, just been following it for a while.
- Russ Graham likes this
#24
Posted 29 September 2014 - 09:47 AM
Its all more of the same. Might have been a phenomenal site for a high rise apartment building. A guess the current trend is the brutal super block design for apartments.
#25
Posted 29 September 2014 - 10:03 AM
Its all more of the same. Might have been a phenomenal site for a high rise apartment building. A guess the current trend is the brutal super block design for apartments.
It's all infil. Not meant to be super glamorous but also not "brutal", either.
THIS is brutal:
- renamerusk and McHand like this
#26
Posted 29 September 2014 - 12:43 PM
I actually prefer the two towers at the intersection. I think that you can get as many units with that tower design as you can get with the 3-4 story ranch styled complexes. I don't actually see the Hulen/Vickery location as infill as much as I would categorize such space use within downtown. So, there is little variety in apartment choices being offered in Fort Worth other than the Tower. When the first developer does a tower, I think it will quickly lease out.
- McHand likes this
#27
Posted 29 September 2014 - 01:48 PM
I actually prefer the two towers at the intersection. I think that you can get as many units with that tower design as you can get with the 3-4 story ranch styled complexes. I don't actually see the Hulen/Vickery location as infill as much as I would categorize such space use within downtown. So, there is little variety in apartment choices being offered in Fort Worth other than the Tower. When the first developer does a tower, I think it will quickly lease out.
If it weren't Hulen and Vickery, I'd be more open to towers.
I don't know. That area just doesn't look ripe for any HIGH rises to me.
#28
Posted 29 September 2014 - 01:49 PM
A tower is radically more expensive to build than a 3-5 story apartment building. And towers aren't appropriate everywhere. All of these smaller infill projects increase density, and that in turn makes eventual higher buildings (where appropriate) more likely.
- Austin55, Jeriat and Russ Graham like this
--
Kara B.
#29
Posted 29 September 2014 - 02:58 PM
So, there is little variety in apartment choices being offered in Fort Worth other than the Tower.
There are no apartments in the Tower. It is all condo.
#30
Posted 29 September 2014 - 03:20 PM
So, there is little variety in apartment choices being offered in Fort Worth other than the Tower.
There are no apartments in the Tower. It is all condo.
I believe that it is merely semantics whether you lease or you purchase living space; the point being made, is that there is little variety in multifamily style that is being currently offered. There are examples of varieties that I speak of: Trinity Terrance and The Strayton offer a different choice from the more traditional retirement complexes; the just completed new Mckinney Tower in Dallas is marketed as high rise rental apartments; and The House in Dallas is too.
As to the Tower, maybe someone who lives in the Tower will have an answer to the following supposition: Are there condos being sub-leased in the tower?
It has been suggested that Fort Worth is in the early stage of creating critical density; I agree. I also think that the rules of efficiency do tend to argue that the more the vertical space is increased, the more the efficiency output of the ground space that it sits on. I also find that the footprint of vertical buildings are less brutal than the footprint of box structures like Hulen/Vickery.
- McHand likes this
#31
Posted 29 September 2014 - 03:40 PM
A tower is radically more expensive to build than a 3-5 story apartment building. And towers aren't appropriate everywhere. All of these smaller infill projects increase density, and that in turn makes eventual higher buildings (where appropriate) more likely.
Well, there is some evidence to dispute that argument. The availability of land is probably the key factor; and this as we know, a lack of land is not the case in Fort Worth today.
And yet, high rises will always be more efficient, create more density, and are less of a strain on infrastructure than super box buildings. What we are getting are quick, cookie cutter big box developments which are a tip of the hat to the Walmart Model; and IMO, the big box model has become monotonous.
http://thesocietypag...er-kate-ascher/
#32
Posted 29 September 2014 - 05:14 PM
#33
Posted 30 September 2014 - 02:29 PM
Its all more of the same. Might have been a phenomenal site for a high rise apartment building. A guess the current trend is the brutal super block design for apartments.
As someone who looked at apartments when moving to Fort Worth two years ago, I can tell you that it's an improvement. For starters, that location is incredibly difficult to beat, convenience-wise. There are other options in that area, such as Marquis which has three properties in the area, but they'are all a bit bland. I haven't seen interior pictures of this new project, but at worst it's a brand-new 'bland' with a parking garage. Not everything can be a Golf Warehouse, sadly.
It'll be interesting to see what direction the Clearfork apartments take (probably bland mass-appeal as well).
- renamerusk and McHand like this
#34
Posted 03 January 2015 - 09:05 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Arlington Heights
Arlington Heights
Projects and New Construction →
Commercial →
Montgomery Ave Dairy Queen SiteStarted by Austin55, 04 Dec 2019 Arlington Heights |
|
|||
Arlington Heights
Projects and New Construction →
Commercial →
Hotel DryceStarted by Austin55, 18 Dec 2018 Arlington Heights |
|
|||
Arlington Heights
Projects and New Construction →
Commercial →
The PARC - 4801 W. FreewayStarted by John T Roberts, 18 Jun 2018 Arlington Heights |
|
|||
Arlington Heights
Projects and New Construction →
Commercial →
New restaurant/bar on Hulen with patio and play area up for Council approvalStarted by JBB, 07 Mar 2017 Arlington Heights |
|
|||
Arlington Heights
Projects and New Construction →
Commercial →
New Project at Hulen & BryceStarted by Jimmy, 12 Jan 2017 Arlington Heights |
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users